Michael Voris interviews Patrick Archbald. Both of them are using the hermeneutic of discontinuity in the interpretation of Vatican Council II: they are using a false statement to interpret the Council.
They have never interpreted Vatican Council II as being in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and with no ambiguity. There has always been ambiguity for them Since they assume that all salvation referred to in Vatican Council is visible, known, explicit.This is irrational. With this irrational understanding they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Then they blame the Council.
-Lionel Andrades
http://new.livestream.com/churchmilitanttv/events/2797527
Posts
2 comments:
..vatican 2 purely pastoral..it does not bind anyone's faith...they do not err ..they blame the aberrant notions of many who choose to make it an addendum of the extraordinary universal magisterium..which it is not
Yes Vatican II is pastoral but when one assumes that those saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) for example are physically visible to us then it contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. These persons visible in Heaven are supposed to be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So a pastoral Council becomes dogmatic.We have a New Revelation. A new doctrine on salvation.
Post a Comment