Father Paolo Scarafoni L.C is the Rector of the University of Europe and Prof. Roberto de Mattei head of the Faculty of Historical Sciences at the same university and interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise. This protects their career and there are no legal threats based on Leftist laws.
They are both using the false premise of being able to see the dead.So Vatican Council is presented as a break with Tradition, a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors. This is politically correct with the Left but it is also a lie. Since there are no such cases known to us of the dead in Heaven being visible on earth.
There are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is not affirmed by either Fr.Scarafoni or Roberto Mattei.
When I was studying Philosophy at the University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum (UPRA) Fr.Paolo Scarafoni was the Rector. I was told my scholarship would be stopped if I did not end distributing pamphlets, outside the university premises on the Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis SJ by the CDF, Dominus Iesus and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Fr.Scarafoni and the faculty at the UPRA were receiving the threats by the leftists.
Now Fr.Paolo Scarafoni and Prof. Roberto Mattei are interpreting Vatican Council II in which LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are considered visible exceptions to the traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus.These cases are considered visible when really they are invisible for us and so irrelevant to the dogma on salvation.
Father Paolo Scarafoni has majored in dogmatic theology and is presently teaching theology at UPRA. He interprets Vatican Council II with the irrationality of the dead-saved, now in Heaven being visible exceptions.
He could not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2000-2002 when he was the Rector of the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA). His theology supposes that there are known exceptions. This prevented any personal charges against him and threats to his career as a Rector.It was also a denial of the Catholic Faith.
He could not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2000-2002 when he was the Rector of the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA). His theology supposes that there are known exceptions. This prevented any personal charges against him and threats to his career as a Rector.It was also a denial of the Catholic Faith.
They are both not affirming the Catholic Faith clearly and honestly. They claim that there are known exceptions in Vatican Council II to the literal and traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This error is taught to the students and the faculty avoid controversy.
Also to suggest that the Holy Office 1949 condemned Fr.Leonard Feeney for heresy for not accepting the baptism of desire as an exception to the dogma, is to imply that Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment