Friday, February 7, 2014

Third Order members of the Franciscans of the Immaculate clarify Cardinal Braz and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi's position : all religious communities must accept implicit or explicit salvation

The Manelli family members  of the Third Order of the Franciscans of the Immaculate (F.I), lay members, must observe that the Apostolic Commissioner to the Franciscan Friars and Sisters of the Immaculate , Fr.P.Fidenzio Volpi alongwith  Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz and Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo, the President and Secretary respectively of the Congregation for Institutes of Religious Life and Societies of Apostolic Life are not allowing Catholics to affirm implicit, invisible for us baptism of desire along with the literal and traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
Fr. Fidenzio Volpi's religious community the Franciscans  (Capuchins) are not permitted to proclaim  the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also to proclaim invisible for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
 
Instead the Franciscan(Cap.) and all Catholic religious communities  must accept that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible to us on earth, we know these cases in real life. This is a lie.
 
It is a lie being  forced upon on all religious communities including the Franciscans of the Immaculate religious and  Third Order members.This is a lie which would be imposed also on Fr.Stefano Manelli, the founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate.
professio-fidei













 
 Based upon this lie, lawyer Mariarosaria De Mucci, must know that all Catholic religious communities including that of Fr.Fidenzio Volpi, have to assume that Vatican Council II (LG 16- saved in invincible ignorance etc) contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
According to Italian law , intentional falsehood is a punishable crime.
radio 
Also, all the Third Order  members associated with the religious communities in the Catholic Church, must accept this view which is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction. Since for Fr.Volpi the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is explicit  and visible in the flesh this would contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says all need to enter the Church visibly (explicitly). It would also contradict Vatican Council II which says all need faith and baptism,(which is explicit) for salvation (AG 7). This would also be a contradiction of  the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846, Dominus Iesus 20 etc. This violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction has to be accepted by members of the Third Order of the Franciscans of the Immaculate.
missionaria3 
All members of the Franciscans of the Immaculate must have the right to be rational and truthful.
 
They must have the right to affirm the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus along with salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II (LG 16, UR 3, LG 8 etc)  as being implicit and invisible for us and not explicit, visible in the flesh.They must have the right to say that they cannot see the dead who are now saved in Heaven.
 
All the religious communities, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelites , Franciscans, must have the right to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus alongwith salvation or condemnation (LG 14- those who know and do not enter) as being implicit for us and explicit only for God.
Francescane-dell-Immacolata 
So could the Manelli family members confirm that:
 
1. They affirm Vatican Council II along with the traditional, centuries-old interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation. The text of the dogma does not mention any exceptions. Neither do they know of any exceptions in 2014.
 
2. Also could they ask their lawyer to ask Fr.Fidenzio Volpi  and Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz if they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or do they assume there are visible exceptions known to them in 2014 and these exceptions are mentioned in Vatican Council II .
 
Could the members of the Third Order  and especially the Manelli family members clarify this issue personally or ask their lawyer to do so.
 
According to Canon Law Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi  need to affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church.
1. Explicit for us baptism of desire is not a teaching of the Catholic Church.
2. It is not allowed to deny an ex cathedra dogma, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which Pope Pius XII called an 'infallible teaching' (Letter of the Holy Officwe 1949).
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: