Friday, November 15, 2013

AP and Reuters imply Pope Pius XII could see the dead

AP and Reuters imply that Pope Pius XII made a doctrinal and objective error .No one from the Catholic hierarchy is corrects the media.
If there is an apple in a box of oranges, the apple is an exception because it exists. If it did not exist there in the box it would not be an exception.
If cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (LG 16) are not known to us in 2013 then they are not exceptions to the dogma outside the Church no salvation and the Syllabus of Errors, which say all need to convert into the Church for salvation.There is no correction by Archbishop Gerhard Muller Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
This also applies to journalism. AP and Reuters correspondent's do not know any exceptions in 2013 to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They cannot name any one saved in Heaven this year, with the baptism of desire.
Yet so many times they have repeated that Vatican Council II has changed the Church's teaching on Jews. They repeat the political position of the ADL, that Jews do not have to convert any more into the Church, according to Vatican Council II.
For them Pope Pius XII had made a big change in Catholic theology which was carried over into Vatican Council II.
Otherwise how could Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office be a break with the past if the pope did not know of visible exceptions.
-Lionel Andrades

SSPX (N.America) has no comment on Cardinal Koch's 'two extreme tendencies'

The SSPX (N.America) has not commented on Cardinal Kurt Koch's saying there are 'two extreme tendencies' in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The cardinal's statement is false.Since only when you use an irrational premise in the interpretation of the Council there are 'two extreme tendencies'. Without the non traditional premise , Vatican Council II is part of the Deposit of the Faith.It is in accord with the traditional teaching  on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
The liberal cardinals are now presenting Vatican Council II as being 'ambiguous' and with' two extreme tendencies'.Since they do not want to accept that the Council is traditional and only has one rational hermeneutic, the hermeneutic of continuity.There is only one rational choice.It is the one without the false premise.
Without the false premise  Cardinal Koch cannot cite any text in Vatican Council II  which is a break with Tradition on the issues dealt with by the Council for Christian Unity and relations with the Jews, the office of which he is the president.
The SSPX (N.America) still acts as if they don't know what is happening and what is the basis for the new doctrines and ecclesiology attributed wrongly to Vatican Council II, in general.
To able to point out Cardinal Kurt Koch's error the SSPX (USA/Canada) would have to admit they are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism.They also made a mistake in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. They assumed that 'implicit desire',mentioned in the Letter,  was a known exception to 'the dogma', the 'infallible teaching', also mentioned in the Letter.They wanted Fr.Leonard Feeney to say that he could see the dead saved in invincible ignorance.
It's time to clarify this point on their website. It's a few years now since I have been repeating it.
How can you offer the Traditional Latin Mass and repeat a lie even after being repeatedly informed?
-Lionel Andrades

Fr.Jean Marie Gleize who made an objective error in ecclesiology protests the beatification

Fr.Jean Marie Gleize who says there is an exceptional way of salvation, as if we know of exceptions in 2013, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has protested the beatification of Pope John Paul II and Pope John XXII. He is officially supported by Bishop Bernard Fellay the Superior General of the SSPX.
 VaticanoII un dibattito aperto
According to the website of the SSPX (N.America) (1): 
The serious problems with the beatification of John XXIII and John Paul II, and the difficulties that result now from their canonization, force us to question the soundness of the beatifications and canonizations proclaimed since Vatican Council II, according to a new procedure and unheard-of criteria. Le Courrier de Rome #341 (February 2011) published a study under the title “Beatification and Canonization Since Vatican II”, in which Fr. Jean-Michel Gleize, professor of Ecclesiology at the Seminary of Econe, points out three difficulties that show how far our doubts on the question are from being groundless. Here is a summary by the author himself.

Fr. Gleize's summary

Without pretending to give the final word on the matter (for that is reserved to God), we can at least point out three major difficulties that suffice to raise doubts as to the soundness of the new beatifications and canonizations. The first two question the infallibility and certitude of these acts. The third questions their very definition
Fr.Gleize has made a factual error. He has assumed that the dead are visible to us. He then concludes that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So like the SSPX leadership he is critical of Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II.
The website states:
The 1989 Profession of Faith in effect distinguishes three categories of truths that constitute the object of the teaching of the supreme Magisterium: truths formally revealed and infallibly defined, truths taught authentically, and truths proposed definitively and infallibly because of a logical link or historical connection with formal Revelation.
In the Nicene Creed, which is recited during the Profession of Faith the SSPX leadership and Fr.John Marie Gleize mean there are 'three known baptisms for the forgivess of sins, water,blood and desire'. Reason and faith tell us that there is only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sin. The baptism of desire and blood are known only to God and are not visible to us as is the baptism of water.
So this is a first class heresy of Fr.John Marie Gleize . It also contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement (2012) (2) in which the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is affirmed and it was said  that there are no exceptions.

Without the Fr.John Marie Gleize's exceptional way, Vatican Council II is traditional and the SSPX should be welcoming the beatification of the two popes.
Without known exceptions to the defined dogma on salvation there is no new ecclesiology taught in Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades

Press Release of Fr. Christian Bouchacourt, SSPX District Superior for South America

The Society of St. Pius X recalls the Catholic doctrine taught in the Encyclical Mortalium animos of Pope Pius XI, as it can be found on the official website of the Vatican:

2. …For since they hold it for certain that men destitute of all religious sense are very rarely to be found, they seem to have founded on that belief a hope that the nations, although they differ among themselves in certain religious matters, will without much difficulty come to agree as brethren in professing certain doctrines, which form as it were a common basis of the spiritual life. For which reason conventions, meetings and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who have unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and pertinacity deny His divine nature and mission.
Certainly such attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy, since they all in different ways manifest and signify that sense which is inborn in us all, and by which we are led to God and to the obedient acknowledgment of His rule.
Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it, and little by little turn aside to naturalism and atheism, as it is called; from which it clearly follows that one who supports those who hold these theories and attempt to realize them, is altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion.
Without any kind of resentment against any other religious community, the Society of St. Pius X adheres to this immutable doctrine and firmly disapproves of the planning of any interreligious ceremony in Catholic churches.
Fr. Christian Bouchacourt, Buenos Aires on November 13, 2013