Monday, November 11, 2013

Fr.Mauro Tranquilo and Archbishop Gerhard Muller

Fr.Mauro Tranquilo is respected by other SSPX priests.They consider him the theologian at Albano.
 
He should ask Archbishop Gerhard Muller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican a few questions about Vatican Council II.
Since Archbishop Muller has said Vatican Council II is traditional and both traditionalists and progressives need to correct their interpretation is he saying:
1. Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes7) is in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and
2.LG 16, LG 8, AG 11, UR 3, NA 3 are not known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 ?
Would it be accepted by Archbishop Muller if the SSPX said Vatican Council II has not changed Church teachings regarding the Jewish Left, and other non Catholics.?
-Lionel Andrades

Same error in SSPX books repeated by Opus Dei university

The same error in books published by the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX, Italy and N. America Districts) had been made  by Fr. Francesco Giordano for his  Masters Degree in Theology at the Angelicum, the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, Rome. It was then accepted by the Theology Faculty at the University of the Holy Cross,Rome. With the same error he is entitled to a Doctorate in Theology degree at this Opus Dei university.Then he will keep teaching this heresy to Catholic students.
FrGiordano1's profile photo
Fr.Giordano and the SSPX priests interpret Pope Pius XII in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 as mistaking implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. It is mistaken as  being known exceptions to the traditonal interpretation of the infallible dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
To further accomodate this irrationality Fr.Giordano in his doctoral thesis at the Opus Dei university would have to interpret, or misinterpret St. Robert Bellarmine.
 
Fr.Giordano was proud of his Master's thesis on outside the church no salvation in which he criticizes Fr.Leonard Feeney.In other words Pope Pius XII made a mistake.Fr.Leonard Feeney had to say that he could see the dead saved in invincible ignorance etc who are known exceptions to his literal interpretation of outside the church no salvation.He refused this say this.
 
Traditionalists and liberals are expressing this irrationality. With this same irrationality, the  SSPX and Opus Dei, are interpreting Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II is not ambigous unless this error of visible exceptions is used in the interpretation.
Last month  the SSPX conference at Rimini,Italy  also did not bring up this  issue which it avoided at the conference in 2012. Rorate Caeili had posted my comments asking the speakers of the Rimini 2012 conference to answer basic questions.They have not  answered them once again.
It is difficult for the SSPX and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities in the USA, to admit that they had made a mistake all these years in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Ad Gentes 7 agrees with the interpretation of  the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, according to Fr. Leonard Feeney. There are no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to Ad Gentes 7. AG 7 is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the sub title Outside the church no salvation.
Opus Dei - Bishop Javier Echevarría
Bishop Javier Echevarría, is the Prelate of Opus Dei and Grand Chancellor of the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross.He probably has the same understanding of Vatican  Council II as Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the SSPX.
 
According to Bishop Fellay, Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition on the issues of other religions and ecumenism. This would be true if Bishop Fellay is making the same error as the SSPX priests, Opus Dei and Fr. Francesco Giordano.
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________________
 
Is Feeneyism Catholic
 


SSPX conference in Rimini again does not discuss the error in SSPX books

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/sspx-conference-in-rimini-again-does.html#links

SSPX did not protest at the error in the Lineamenta for the New Evangelisation -for obvious reasons

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/sspx-did-not-protest-at-error-in.html#links

For political reasons SSPX priests are silent


Cristina Siccardi

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/cristina-riccardi.html#links

Bishop Bernard Fellay could check the non traditional, irrational errors in SSPX books

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/bishop-bernard-fellay-could-check-non.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/objective-error-in-new-sspx-italy-book.html#links

Elementary My Dear Watson!