He may not know it is the interpretation of Freemasonary on whom he has recently done a good informative and critical program.However there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. The interpretations are not based on theology or an opinion but based on an objective fact.
It may be mentioned that the apologist and former Mason John Salza has said that the main effort of the Freemasons was against Church doctrine and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The enemies of the Church were successful in Boston where the Jewish Left (Masons, kabbalists etc) were growing in strength about the time of the creation of Israel.
They chose to interpret the dogma on exclusive salvation using the premise of us being able to see the dead on earth who are known exceptions to the dogma.
Michael Voris, SSPX and members of the Roman Forum are using this irrational interpretation of the dogma. They have a choice. They could interpret all Magisterial texts including Vatican Council II knowing that there are no exceptions known to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This would be a radical change in our understanding of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.