There is no advocacy group for extra ecclesiam nulla salus :Bishop of Calgary offers Mass as usual

How can the Holy Spirit teach error and irrationality in the interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II.

There is not a single advocacy group for extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For instance the bishop of Calgary,Canada Bishop Frederick Henry knows that there are no known cases on earth of persons saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.He knows those who are saved in Heaven are not physically visible to us on earth.So he knows that these cases cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and every one needing to be visible members of the Catholic Church for salvation.There are no known exceptions to the dogma on salvation which says every one needs to convert into the Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II to contradict the dogma and Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says Catholic Faith and the baptism of water are needed by all for salvation.

After knowing all this he will not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in public and neither the message of Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.

It is obligatory for all bishops to affirm Vatican Council II and an ex cathedra dogma, in this case, defined three times. The bishop will say that he accepts the Council and the Catechism but he means he accepts them with an irrational premise which says the dead are visible. It is with this premise (the dead man walking theory) that he interprets Magisterial documents as a break with Tradition, a break with the dogma on salvation and the Syllabus of Errors.

Canon Law must also apply to the bishop and there is no advocacy group to bring this to his attention.

He sees the Catechism and the Vatican Council II as a break with the past ( dogma on salvation) and with an irrationality (being able to see the dead).This is heretical.

He is implying that the Holy Spirit teaches this error. He does not issue a clarification and continues to offer Holy Mass

He criticizes Vatican Council II while using the  dead man walking theory and expects the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) to do the same .

How can he employ lay people and heads of Tribunals who believe that they can see the dead on earth ? How can priests in his diocese deny the Council with the dead man premise?

No one discusses this with him officially since there are no pro extra ecclesiam nulla salus groups as there are pro life organisations in the Catholic Church.

How can someone claim to be  Catholic and a competent bishop and then suggest that his priests and nuns in the diocese can see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) etc. No one phones him up and tells him that one cannot interpret the Catechism and the Council with this irrationality.There will be informed non Catholics and non Christians who will be wondering as to what is happening in the Catholic Church and the diocese of Calgary.-Lionel Andrades

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith cannot fault the Society of St.Pius X for 'rejecting Vatican Council II'

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican cannot fault the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) for 'rejecting Vatican Council II' since the SSPX accepts the Council as a historical reality but only rejects an interpretation of the Council with the dead-man-walking premise.This makes the Council modernist.

If the CDF clarifies the issue of the dead man  premise being used, the SSPX could accept Vatican Council II - and then the Paulist Fathers in Rome would reject it.

Recently Bishop Charles Morerod  prohibited the SSPX from offering Mass in the churches in his diocese in Switzerland since for him the issue was 'doctrinal.' He wants the SSPX to accept that there is known salvation outside the Church. The dead are visible walking on the streets of Swtzerland, saved in invincible ignorance, the seeds of the word, imperfect communion with the church etc. Invisible cases are visible to him. Salvation in Heaven is visible to him on earth.These cases are exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities.

So for him, when the SSPX is ready to acknowledge that Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) is an exception to Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) then it will be doctrinally correct. Bishop Morerod is the former Rector of the Angelicum University,Rome  where this irrationality is still being taught.With this irrationality the SSPX is sure to  get access to the Churches in Switzerland, to offer Mass.

If the CDF faults the SSPX it will be for political reasons. It will be for not rubber stamping an interpretation of the Council which says that the dead saved and now in Heaven are generally visible to us on earth.This is the irrationality they want the priests of the SSPX to accept before they offer Mass.

The CDF should be correcting Bishop Charles Morerod and the bishop of Calgary, Bishop Frederick Henry who assume that the dead are visible and so the Catechism and Vatican Council II contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7.They both are publicly critical of the Society of St.Pius X .-Lionel Andrades