The SSPX (N.America) has not commented on Cardinal Kurt Koch's saying there are 'two extreme tendencies' in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The cardinal's statement is false.Since only when you use an irrational premise in the interpretation of the Council there are 'two extreme tendencies'. Without the non traditional premise , Vatican Council II is part of the Deposit of the Faith.It is in accord with the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
The liberal cardinals are now presenting Vatican Council II as being 'ambiguous' and with' two extreme tendencies'.Since they do not want to accept that the Council is traditional and only has one rational hermeneutic, the hermeneutic of continuity.There is only one rational choice.It is the one without the false premise.
Without the false premise Cardinal Koch cannot cite any text in Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition on the issues dealt with by the Council for Christian Unity and relations with the Jews, the office of which he is the president.
The SSPX (N.America) still acts as if they don't know what is happening and what is the basis for the new doctrines and ecclesiology attributed wrongly to Vatican Council II, in general.
To able to point out Cardinal Kurt Koch's error the SSPX (USA/Canada) would have to admit they are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism.They also made a mistake in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. They assumed that 'implicit desire',mentioned in the Letter, was a known exception to 'the dogma', the 'infallible teaching', also mentioned in the Letter.They wanted Fr.Leonard Feeney to say that he could see the dead saved in invincible ignorance.
It's time to clarify this point on their website. It's a few years now since I have been repeating it.
How can you offer the Traditional Latin Mass and repeat a lie even after being repeatedly informed?
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment