Unknowingly, Pope Francis like most Jesuits, interprets magisterial documents using a false premise.From Mystici Corporis of Pope Pius XII to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, he inserts irrationality into the text. This is the basis of a political ideology. He reads simple Catholic documents as emerging liberal, non traditional and pro-Left. Here are some examples.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel...-Ad Gentes 7
FEENEYISM: The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM: The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Pope Francis uses the irrational interpretation of the two possibilities above.
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846
FEENEYISM: The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM: The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Pope Francis uses Cushingism which is irrational, a break with the past and leans towards the political ideology of the Left. He does all this by using a false premise. The false premise is being able to see the dead who are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is the case of the dead man walking and visible to him.
Pope Francis uses Cushingism which is irrational, a break with the past and leans towards the political ideology of the Left. He does all this by using a false premise. The false premise is being able to see the dead who are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is the case of the dead man walking and visible to him.
The false premise which the pope uses, entered the Church in the 1940s in Boston. Traditionalists however are free from this objective error.It is a fact that we cannot see the dead.So when Pope Francis referred to the 'political ideology' of the Traditional Latin Mass he was refering to Catholics who support Tradition, which is free of the false premise.
However traditionalsts (SSPX, FSSP, sedevacantists) make the same error of the pope when they intepret magisterial documents after 1940 using the same irrational premise; the dead man walking theory, which contradicts the dogma which says all need to be visible members of the Catholic Church.
Over the last few months Pope Francis has extended this error to morals, this factual error, of knowing exceptions to traditonal teaching.So when he says an atheist can be saved he is referring to a known case. Since he can seemingly name someone who will be an exceptional case in future and be saved. This is irrational however this is the reasoning he and the liberals use.The Church teaches, traditionally that the atheist is going to Hell. We know Pope Francis does not know any excpetion since a seemingly good person could commit a mortal sin later in life and lose his salvation at the point of death.
With this irrationality Pope Francis creates a 'political idelogy' pleasing to the the dissenters and heretics and the political Left now in power.Of course this is not the 'political ideology' of the Traditonal Latin Mass as he mentioned in the interview with the Jesuit magazine, which in general, also uses the false premise in interpreting magisterial documents.
So the next time Pope Francis is critical of 'triumphalism' know that he means there are known exceptions in 2013 to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
When he asks who is he to judge the homosexual , he means he can meet a practising homosexual, whom he has judged as not going to Hell.Another known exception.
It is as if he can name a homosexual or atheist in the present times who is an exception. This sinner does not need to change his life style or enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.This is the legacy of the Jesuits, when they dismissd Fr.Leonard Feeney from the Jesuit Order claiming there are known exceptions to his literal and traditional interpretation of the dogma on salvation.
When he does not tell a non Catholic that he needs to enter the Church for salvation he means there are known cases, exceptions, to the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
When he assumes that Vatican Council II is a break with the past he assumes there are known exceptions mentioned in the Council, to Tradition in general.
When he does not tell a non Catholic that he needs to enter the Church for salvation he means there are known cases, exceptions, to the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
When he assumes that Vatican Council II is a break with the past he assumes there are known exceptions mentioned in the Council, to Tradition in general.
I don't know if Pope Francis knows that if he did not use the dead man walking theory he and the Church would be persecuted by those who now are praising him.-Lionel Andrades
First Saturday
First Saturday
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment