Wednesday, October 23, 2013

SSPX priests could ask Archbishop Muller to accept Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism

There are four priests of the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) who have commented on LG 16,LG 8 and UR 3, the controversial passages in Vatican Council II. They have interpreted these passages according to Feeneyism and Tradition.They could ask Archbishop Muller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican to do the same.Affirm the Council according to Feeneyism!
Seminario di Econe - ordinazioni 29 giugno 2009
Why do they have to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and assume that LG 16,LG 8 and UR 3 refer to known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to AG 7?
 
Since the criteria for canonical status is accepting Vatican Council II, they could accept the entire Vatican Council II interpreted according to Feeneyism.Would this be acceptable to Archbishop Muller?
According to Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) Ad Gentes 7 says all non Catholics and all non Christians , all people, need 'faith and baptism' for salvation, while, LG 16, LG 8 and UR 3 are not known exceptions to AG 7. Would this traditional Council be acceptable to Archbishop Muller ?
Aside from the SSPX , why do we Catholics who regularly attend the Novus Ordo Mass, have to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism instead of Feeneyism?We can affirm the 'rigorist interpretation' of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston, along with Vatican Council II, they are compatible.
Even the Franciscans, Dominicans and Jesuits, all Catholic religious communities who now have canonical status, can affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney which is compatible with Vatican Counci II and other magisterial documents.
 
Since Vatican Council II is compatible with the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus why is the Traditional Latin Mass only associated with the dogma on salvation and not the Novus Ordo Mass? Since for the priest who offers the Novus Ordo Mass, too, LG 16, LG 8 and UR 3 etc are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
The four SSPX priests with whom I have spoken to, could appeal to all Catholic religious communities, to accept Vatican Council II , according to Feeneyism. There is no other rational alternative.
A Dean of Theology and a Dean of Philosophy at Pontifical Universities in Rome, have said that there are no known exceptions to the dogma on salvation.They affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma. They also offer the Novus Ordo Mass.
 
Since there are no known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II , why cannot the SSPX be granted canonical status ? Since the Council is traditional anyway,when interpreted with Feeneyism.Archbishop Muller has only to affirm Vatican Council II in public  according to Feeneyism and this would be a welcome path for the SSPX and sedevacantists.
Since Archbishop Gerhard Muller cannot name any 'exception' in 2013, why does he want the SSPX to say the Council is a break with Tradition ?
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: