Lionel:
Yes he thinks Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past since he thinks the Council is ambigous.
He has accepted the interpretation of the Council according to Cardinal Richard Cushing, John Courtney Murray and the others.
He also does not seem to know that he has a choice.
He does not seem to know that if he does not use the premise of the visible dead, the Council is not a break with the past, on other religions and Christians communities and churches.
Lionel:
George he does think that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past since he says it is ambigous.The Council is not ambigous on the issue of other religions and Christian communities.
AG 7 and LG 14 interpreted with Feeneyism and not Cushingism affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There are no known exceptions mentioned in AG 7 or LG 14 or other texts of Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
(from commensts on the blogpost : Michael Voris, Louie Verrechio using Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to analyse Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/09/michael-voris-louie-verrechio-using.html
Using a press release issued by the Archdiocese of Detroit, the Diocese of Scranton issued this statement in response to a planned speaking engagement of Voris in that diocese:
"The Diocese of Scranton has determined that Mr. Voris will not be allowed to speak in a Diocesan or parish facility. After these engagements were scheduled, the Diocese became aware of concerns about this individual’s views regarding other religious groups. In videos posted on the Internet, Mr. Voris makes comments that certainly can be interpreted as being insensitive to people of other faiths. The Catholic Church teaches us to respect all people, regardless of their faith tradition."
"Although the Diocese shares Mr. Voris’ support of efforts to protect human life, his extreme positions on other faiths are not appropriate and therefore the Diocese cannot host him."[]
-Wikipedia, Michael Voris