The Most Holy Family Monastery (MHFM) refer to the 'Vatican Council II sect' which Vatican Council II are they referring to, according to Cushingism or Feeneyism ?

When the sedevacantists Most Holy Family Monastery refer to Vatican Council II they know only one interpretation. Irrational Cushingism. Their entire concept of Vatican Council II is built on the theory of their being known exceptions to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on faith and morals. This was the original error of the Archbishop of Boston Richard Cushing.

So when they criticize the Catholic Church for their interpretation of Vatican Council II, according to Cushing, they do not seem to realize that there can be a Vatican Council II interpreted according to Feeneyism, which states there are no known exceptions to the Catholic Church's teachings on faith and morals.

The sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond themself err when they call Catholics heretics for accepting the baptism of desire, since they assume that the baptism of desire is a known exception to the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on a faith- issue, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So what about someone like me in the Catholic Church. Am I in the Vatican Council II sect when I accept Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and reject Cushingism ?

There can be Catholics, who do have to be sedevacantsts since for them Vatican Council II is in agreement with the Catholic Church's teachings on other religions and Christian communities and churches.

For me the MHFM would be a Catholic sect since they interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past but then so also would be the Vatican Curia. They also interpret the Council, like the MHFM, with irrational Cushingism.

-Lionel Andrades