The SSPX (USA) is having a conference in October in the USA where they are expected to churn out the same irrationality and call it the doctrinal teaching of the Catholic Church.
The speakers include Bishop Bernard Felllay, Prof. Roberto dei Mattei, Dr.John Rao, none of whom will differentiate between Vatican Council II with the false premise (of the dead being visible) and a Vatican Council without this error in the interpretation.
All the speakers in October will use the false premise and then go into meandering conclusions as they have done in the past.
They will not differentiate between the official teaching of the Catholic Church with a rational interpretation of magisterial texts and the unofficial, popular interpretation of magisterial texts.
They will interpret the Council using the irrational premise of the dead man being a known exception in the present times, to the need for all to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation, to avoid Hell.
So with extra ecclesiam nulla salus eliminated, of course, they will have a Vatican Council which is ambiguous and a break with the past. Then instead of criticizing each other on being irrational, they will criticize the Council.
The speakers will take it for granted that when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre mentioned the Hindu in Tibet who would be saved in his religion, this Hindu is, for them, known in the present times, they can even name him! So he is a present day known exception to all needing to convert into the Church.
Similalry they will assume all who are saved,as alluded to in Vatican Council II, are known in the present times.They know someone today saved in 'imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3), they can physically see someone saved with the 'seeds of the Word' (AG 11) etc. So for them these are contradictions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this makes the Council liberal.
As usual at the Angelus Conference 2013 :
1) They will use the unofficial interpretation of magisterial texts instead of the official.(1)
2. They will use the Richard Cushing Error.
3. They will be unaware that since the Council was created traditional, liberals do not have any rational text in Vatican Council II to support their errors.
4) They will not know that Vatican Council II affirms the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
5. They will not know that there can be only one rational interpretation (without the visible dead theory ).So the Council affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an ecumenism of return. There is also a moral obligation to work for a Catholic political state.
It means the SSPX made a doctrinal error in the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney. They used the unofficial,irrational interpretation of magisterial texts instead of the official, traditional interpretation.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
SSPX ducked two questions on Rorate Caeili at the conference in Italy last year: new one is being held
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment