Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J, Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,(CDF) Vatican and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, Vice President,Ecclesia Dei, CDF have been associated with the International Theological Commission. Archbishop Gerhard Muller, Prefect of the CDF is the present ex officio President of the ITC.
The ITC states on line that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr.Leonard Feeney.(See Christianity and the World Religions 1997,ITC,N.66,67,68 and'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized' 2007 N.58,59).
If there are exceptions it means Pope Pius XII assumed the dead now saved with invincible ignorance etc are known to us.He could name them. So they were exceptions to all needing to convert into the Catholic Church in the present times. They were allegedly explicit and defacto exceptions.
This was not something accepted in principle by Pope Pius XII,according to the ITC , but accepted as explicit and visible, to be an exception.
So here we have it on the ITC Vatican website.Pope Pius XII used the Richard Cushing irrational premise (according to the ITC).
ITC assumes that the Magisterium at the time of Pope Pius XII states:
1) The dead (saved with the baptism of desire etc) are visible to us.
2.)These deceased are visible exceptions to the interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
3)So the baptism of desire etc were known exceptions to the dogma on salvation which Fr.Leonard Feeney rejected.
4)So according to the Magisterium of Pope Pius XII the fault was with Fr.Leonard Feeney.
5) This Magisterial decision is accepted by the present Magisterium (2013).
I am just pointing out that that the magisterium has made a mistake if they are using the Cushing premise( as on the ITC website).
The actual Magisterial texts are heresy-free and it can be interpreted without the Cushing error. Then there is no break with Tradition in magisterial texts.
If anyone would call up Archbishop Augustine Di Noia or other bishops and cardinals , they could confirm- the baptism of desire is an accepted exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The magisterium's oversight was never corrected by the Jesuits or Pope Francis and he could have been teaching the same mistake in theology class in Buenos Aires.
So the Magisterium in the 1940's to that of 2013 have assumed there are known exceptions to everyone needing to convert into the Church for salvation. This is how they have interpreted the text of Quanta Cura (Pope Pius IX) Mystici Corporis and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (Pope Pius XII), Vatican Council II (LG 6,Lg 16, Ag 7, Ag 11, UR 3,NA 2 etc),the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846,1257), Redemptoris Missio (10), Dominus Iesus(20 etc) etc.
This is a false interpretation since the dead are not visible to us. The baptism of desire is a possibility known to God, it is not an exception to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
The mistake is there for anyone to check online on two ITC papers.
-Lionel Andrades
June 26, 2012
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment