Angelus Press book still refers to obsolete concepts as the baptism of desire being known to us and being an exception to the traditional teaching on other religions and salvation.
It's a question of integrity and honesty. The Angelus Press, of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has published a book with factually incorrect information.When they are asked two questions which will expose their error, they refuse to answer them. The book with doctrinal errors is still being sold by the SSPX (USA).
This controversial book is part of the formation of SSPX priests.
This book written by Fr.Francois Laisney and approved by the SSPX bishops assumes the baptisem of desire is a known visible exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It also assumes that when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre referred to the Hindu in Tibet who can be saved , this person is presently known in the present times, he is personally known to SSPX priests and bishops, to be an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Fr.Francois Laisney interprets the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and other magisterial texts, as referring to an explicit for us baptism of desire.
Similarly Fr.Francois Laisney assumes all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II (invincible ignroance LG 16, elements of sanctification LG 8 etc are explicit, known to us exceptions to the traditional Catholic teaching on other religions and Christian communities.With this error they also misundestand Dignitatis Humane, in Vatican Council II on religious liberty.
The SSPX priests and Communications Office do not have the integrity to say there are no known exceptions to literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney and neither does the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 mention any.
The priest whom they slander was excommunicated of disobedience and when they excommunication was lifted , he was not asked by the Catholic Church to recant.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment