The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has issued a Declaration in which it's bishops still seem unaware of the Richard Cushing Error being used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. They are also unaware of the Richard Cushing Error made in the interpretation of two well known quotations of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre on other religions.
Vatican Council II is traditional when interpreted without the Richard Cushing Error. The SSPX like the liberals and the naive, interpret the Council with the false premise of being able to see the dead in Heaven who are allegedly known exceptions to the dogma on salvation and the traditional understanding on other religions.
Here is part of the CNA report on the SSPX statement.
The document – titled “Declaration on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the episcopal consecrations (30th June 1988 – 27th June 2013)” – is signed by Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais and Alfonso de Galarreta...
In their statement Thursday, the group contradicted now-retired Pope Benedict XVI's stance on Vatican II. The letter made explicit reference to the “hermeneutic of continuity,” rejecting the interpretive lens by which Benedict XVI saw the conciliar documents in light of the Church's tradition.
The bishops say that the documents themselves have grave errors and that they cannot be interpreted without clashing with tradition.
In their statement Thursday, the group contradicted now-retired Pope Benedict XVI's stance on Vatican II. The letter made explicit reference to the “hermeneutic of continuity,” rejecting the interpretive lens by which Benedict XVI saw the conciliar documents in light of the Church's tradition.
The bishops say that the documents themselves have grave errors and that they cannot be interpreted without clashing with tradition.
Lionel:
This is false the Second Vatican Council II does not have grave errors. The SSPX is using a false premise, the Richard Cushing Error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.
SSPX websites also indicate that Pope Pius XII assumed the dead saved in invincible ignorance and implicit desire are physically visible on earth for them to be exceptions to the traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.They would have to be physically visible or personally known for them to be exceptions.This would be an objective observation.So for the SSPX, the popes made an objective mistake.This same mistake or interpretation is being used by the SSPX.
The “cause of the grave errors which are in the process of demolishing the Church does not reside in a bad interpretation of the conciliar texts – a 'hermeneutic of rupture' which would be opposed to a 'hermeneutic of reform in continuity,'” they wrote, “but truly in the texts themselves, by virtue of the unheard of choice made by Vatican II.”
Lionel:
False. There is a 'hermeneutic of continuity' when you avoid the Richard Cushing Error. There is a 'hhermeneutic of rupture' if it is assumed that the dead now in Heaven, are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is the Richard Cushing error and the public error also of SSPX priests Fr-Francois Laisney and Fr.Peter Scott on SSPX websites.
The group also claims that the Second Vatican Council “inaugurated a new type of magisterium, hitherto unheard of in the Church, without roots in Tradition; a magisterium resolved to reconcile Catholic doctrine with liberal ideas; a magisterium imbued with the modernist ideas of subjectivism, of immanentism and of perpetual evolution.”
The group also claims that the Second Vatican Council “inaugurated a new type of magisterium, hitherto unheard of in the Church, without roots in Tradition; a magisterium resolved to reconcile Catholic doctrine with liberal ideas; a magisterium imbued with the modernist ideas of subjectivism, of immanentism and of perpetual evolution.”
Lionel:
This is true if one is using the Richard Cushing Error.This is being done by the Vatican Curia, as it is also being maintained by the SSPX bishops and priests who do not want to admit that they made an objective, factual mistake .This is an error of doctrine.
No pope or Church document in Tradition states that we can see the dead who are known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions and Christians communities.If you cannot see the dead, if all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is invisible in the present times, then where are the known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation ? When Ad Gentes 7 is in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, where are the known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the thrice defined dogma? Where is there a rejection of Catholic Tradition on other religions when the Council does not mention any known exception or the possibility of knowing any exceptions who are now in Heaven ?
The Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II are in perfect accord with Tradition when the Richard Cushing Error is avoided. There then is a hermeneutic of continuity.
The document argues that “the reign of Christ is no longer the preoccupation of the ecclesiastical authorities,” and that the liberal spirit in the Church is manifested “in religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality and the New Mass.”
Lionel:
This is true. Church documents are also being interpreted with the liberal error. They use the visible dead premise, the Richard Cushing Error.The SSPX is still not aware of it.
Because of religious liberty, they claim, the Church is being “shamefully guided by human prudence and with such self-doubt that she asks nothing other from the State than that which the Masonic Lodges wish to concede to her: the common law in the midst of, and on the same level as, other religions which she no longer dares call false.”
Because of religious liberty, they claim, the Church is being “shamefully guided by human prudence and with such self-doubt that she asks nothing other from the State than that which the Masonic Lodges wish to concede to her: the common law in the midst of, and on the same level as, other religions which she no longer dares call false.”
Lionel:
This is a factor. However this is all possible since the traditionalists like the liberals and the Masons within the Church are interpreting Church documents (Letter of the Holy Office 1949, Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc ) with the Richard Cushing Error.
Because of inter-religious dialogue, “the truth about the one true Church is silenced,” they also say; while the spirit of collegiality “represents the destruction of authority and in consequence the ruin of Christian institutions: families, seminaries, religious institutes.”
Lionel:
The SSPX is also part of this misinformation. On the SSPX and SSPX-SOS websites,priests claim that every person in the present times do not need to enter the Catholic Church, since there are/can be known exceptions, saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.Irrational!
In other words Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective blunder. According to the SSPX he assumed that implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to cases known to us in the present times. He could name these exceptions.The pope could see the dead, the SSPX implies, and these dead-saved are exceptions to the interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Is this Tradition? Does Mystici Corporis claim that the dead saved are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?It is this objective error which the SSPX uses in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment