Richard Cushing Confusion is all over Vatican Council II : when identified the Council is as traditional as the SSPX

The Richard Cushing Confusion is all over Vatican Council II.Once the Cushing Error is identified Vatican Council II is as traditional as the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX).

The Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing who was active at Vatican Council II assumed wrongly that being saved with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were physically visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This was how he interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

So along with the liberal Jesuits they kept inserting lines in Vatican Council II like 'those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it' and 'God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him' and all must be converted to Him ' made known by the Church's preaching' (Ad Gentes 7).

For the Archbishop of Boston and the liberals at the Council this was all rational even though it was rational at the theoretical, in-principle level and not at the level of reality, where we can know and meet people in real life.

No one at the Council objected successfully and told the Archbishop and Jesuits that we physically cannot see or personally know any one 'saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it' and persons saved who were 'inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him' and saved or condemned after being 'made known by the Church's preaching' (Ad Gentes 7). So these lines are irrelevant to every one needing 'faith and baptism' for salvation (AG 7).

Instead they allowed the Richard Cushing Confusion in Vatican Council II. This was caused by the Richard Cushing Error (assuming the dead-saved are visible). So for a person who does not discern, Vatican Council II comes across as ambigous, with a dual interpretation in Ad Gentes , Lumen Gentium etc.

Once the Cushing Error is identified we know there are no known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 'all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.'

Vatican Council II is traditional on other religions (all need faith and baptism) and on Christian communities and churches (they need Catholic Faith for salvation; the beliefs and Sacraments).

Identify the Richard Cushing Confusion caused by the Richard Cushing Error and Vatican Council II is traditional, rational and non ambigous.

-Lionel Andrades