Odds are that Pope Francis was teaching heresy at the Jesuit theology classes in Argentine

Father Leonard Feeney was a Jesuit. He said that there is no baptism of desire which is an exception to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Jesuits dismissed him from the community.Since that time they have been teaching that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible to us.They allege that we can personally know these cases.So for them these cases of the deceased-visible are bonafide exceptions to the dogma on salvation.They are known exceptions to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the Church Councils, popes and saints' interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This new version of the dogma with the irrational theory , is being taught at Jesuit universities and seminaries all over the world.

So it is likely that the new pope, a Jesuit professor of theology, was also using the dead man walking and visible theory in this 'development of doctrine'.

As a cardinal in Argentine he would also be known to the present Jesuit Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, Cardinal Luis Ladaria S.J. Cardinal Ladaria claims on the Vatican website of the International Theological Commission (ITC) that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.

This error of the Jesuit pope was not corrected by the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX). Since Bishop Richard Williamson as Rector of the SSPX seminary in Argentina also assumed that the baptism of desire was visible and there were known exceptions to the dogma. Neither was it corrected by any of the SSPX members participating in the Vatican-SSPX doctrinal talks.So at universities and seminaries in Argentine too, they could have accepted this 'development of doctrine' based on the irrationality of being able to see the dead alive on earth.

This is iimportant for the SSPX, since it means the new pope will now interpret Vatican Council II (AG 7) as a break with the past and contradicting itself.Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) will contradict Lumen Gentium 16 ( physically visible cases saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience).

LG 16 will also contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors since our pope believes that those saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience are explicitly known to us, we can see them in the flesh. So they are known exceptions to Fr.Leonard Feeney's literal interpretation of the dogma and the rest of Tradition.

It would be a break with the past since the pope will be interpreting the Council with the visible-dead theory. A break with the past ? Does that sound familiar ?

Recently Archbishop Gerhard Muller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican said those who interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past are heretical. He was referring to progressives and traditionalists.He could well be referring to our new pope.

This is an error that the pope can correct. He can finally do justice to the Fr.Leonard Feeney case and correct the factual error made by the Jesuits in Boston.It is a fact that the pope nor any of us can physically see the dead on earth.-Lionel Andrades