Friday, March 1, 2013

Invincible ignorance etc were never relevant or an issue with extra ecclesiam nulla salus: the Americanists made it one



Invincible ignorance etc were never relevant or an issue with extra ecclesiam nulla salus: the Americanists made it one. It had nothing to do with the dogma.

Pope Pius XII mentions implicit desire in Mystici Corporis (1943) in response to a campaign at that time by the modernists.

Pope Pius XII had no need to mention implicit desire in Mystici Corporis since implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are always invisible to us.

So they are not exceptions to the traditional understanding of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Archbishops in Boston maintained the excommunication on Fr.Leonard Feeney for some 19 years and consolidated the error of implicit desire etc being exceptions to the dogma on salvation.How could they be exceptions when we do not know any such case ? They are possibilities known only to God.

The Americanists were determined to change the dogma on salvation.Now after so many years it is becoming clear. It is being asked how can there be exceptions when we do not know any case of the baptism of desire etc ?

The Jesuit Superior dismissed Fr.Leonard Feeney from the Congregation even though the priest was not teaching anything new.The Archbishop deprived the priest of his priestly faculties to dispense the Sacraments even though the baptism of desire etc was not an issue relative to the literal interpretation of the dogma.

When the excommunication was lifted he was not asked to recant and there was still no apology from the Jesuits and the Archbishop.

The media reports continued to say invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to the dogma and so they criticized Fr.Leonard Feeney and his communities.There was no correction from the Vatican. Even today the Americanist error has spread throughout the Church.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has not corrected it.

It is wrongly assumed that Vatican Council II also mentions known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church.  Pope Benedict XVI expected the Society of St.Pius X to accept this version of Vatican Council II, which is modernist because of the error of the Americanists.
Until today the Jesuits, like those in Boston in the 1940's, believe there are known,visible to us, exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There is no apology from them also for the dismissal of the Catholic lay professors at the Jesuit Boston College who refused to consider invincible ignorance etc as being relevant to the dogma.
-Lionel Andrades
 
Thursday, January 24, 2013
The Archbishop of Boston Richard Cushing was in heresy and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was addressed to him.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/01/the-archbishop-of-boston-richard.html

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm so impressed with your knowledge about "extra ecclesiam nulla salus". I guess all who don't belong to the Catholic Church are going to be burning in hell after death, correct?

My question to you is: What exactly are you doing to divert these souls from hell and into the Church?

Bernie

Catholic Mission said...

I guess all who don't belong to the Catholic Church are going to be burning in hell after death, correct?

Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation.Salvation is going to Heaven and avoiding the fires of Hell.

Among other things I write on the issue of salvation according to the doctrines of the Catholic Church.
The doctrines are not known or denied by many Catholics.

When Catholics know the teachings of the Church they will be able to proclaim the Faith well and save souls.