BISHOP HENRY UNABLE TO RESPOND TO HERESY CHARGES

The bishop of Calgary refuses to affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church without implying that the dead saved are visible to us. Neither will he affirm the Catechism in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II. He rejects the dogma on salvation, since for him invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire cases, are explicit and known in 2013.So for him these cases of the deceased, are defacto explicit exceptions to the dogma which says all need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.

Bishop Frederick Henry still refuses to affirm the Catechism without the visible dead theory, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II without it being a heretical break with the past.

Bishop Frederick Henry has responded to my last e-mail .He does not discuss my comments on the Catechism quotations which he had cited instead he calls be a liar and a calumniator.

Bishop Henry writes:

It would seem that you have forgotten that lying, detraction, and calumny are sinful. Pity!

My response was:

Dear Bishop Frederick Henry,

Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.

For the record you have not denied the following:

1.That you reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with known exceptions of invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.

2. That you consider Vatican Council II a break with the past because of known exceptions.

3.You hold the same error as the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Cushing.

4.You interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church assuming the dead who are saved, are visible.

You offer the Holy Mass in this condition.

Instead of responding to these points you accuse me of lying and calumny.

Inn Christ

Lionel Andrades

He has responded without acknowledging that he accepts the Catechism and Vatican Council II with the false premise. He accepts them while assuming that the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are visible to us. So for him they are  exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This was the same error of the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing.

Bishop Henry states:

I accept the Catechism and Vatican II in their totality – do YOU?

He still does not want to discuss this issue and affirm the Faith.The shepherd cannot defend or deny a heretical position.

The Society of St.Pius X's  priests and supporters also  deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  with alleged known exceptions.So they also use a hermeneutic of rupture in the interpretation of Vatican Council II similiar to Bishop Frederick Henry.It is possible that this error is also being made at the SSPX's St.Dennis Catholic Church in Calgary.

Bishop Henry and the SSPX use the irrational premise, the Richard Cushing Error in the interpretation of magisterial documents.

I have responded:

Dear Bishop Frederick Henry,

Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.

It is meaningless for you to say that you accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church when you assume that the references to invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire cases are visible to us in 2013.So you assume that the Catechism refers to explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The Catechism does not state that these cases are explict and known to us and neither does it state that these cases are an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is an irrational premise of yours. You are assuming that the dead saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma.

So you are still denying an ex cathedra dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and you cannot pretend that there are texts in the Catechism which contradict a teaching which is obligatory for all bishops to affirm.

Also since you use the irrational premise of the dead man walking ,saved in invincible ignorance etc and who is visible to you only, for you ,Vatican Council II also must be a break with the dogma on salvation and the past Magisterial texts.

So in your Profession of Faith ,when you say 'I believe in one baptism for the forgivessness of sin' (Nicene Creed) you mean there are three known baptisms,water, desire and blood- and not just one known baptism, that of water.

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop Gerhard Muller, recently said that it was heretical when progressives interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past.

I repeat it is also a heresy to deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

In Christ

Lionel Andrades

He asks if I accept the Catechism. Yes but not with the dead man walking theory. This was the error of the Archbishop and Jesuits at Boston in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.-Lionel Andrades