Friday, January 25, 2013

BISHOP FREDERICK HENRY AND THE SSPX INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II AS BREAK WITH THE PAST : THEY ASSUME THE DEAD ARE VISIBLE AS DID THE ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON RICHARD CUSHING

The Archbishop of Boston was in heresy for denying 'the infallible statement' with allegedly being able to see the dead saved who did not have to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. He contradicted the centuries old dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Similarly when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre says there could be a Hindu in Tibet saved in his religion, through Jesus and the Church,he is referring to a possibility. This is acceptable since implicit to us salvation, as in the case of the Hindu in Tibet, can only be accepted in principle.These cases can never be known personally. HoweverThe Society of St.Pius (SSPX) has always assumed that this case of the Hindu in Tibet was  known in the present times and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the same heresy as Archbishop Richard Cushing .

There are no known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known only to God.So if Fr.Leonard Feeney rejected the baptism of desire as being an explicit exception he was correct.


Bishop Federick Henry of Calgary,Canada has also misinterpreted the Catechism of the Catholic Church like many Catholics.The Catechism of the Catholic Church does not state that invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.So when he implies that invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions, he makes the same error as the Archbishop of Boston.



Without his misinterpretation, the Catechism and Vatican Council II, is in agreement with the Society of St.Pius X's position on other religions and ecumenism.


The bishop is in heresy for firstly denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and then assuming that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is a break with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors; a break with the past.

Archbishop Gerhard Muller has said that those who interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past are heretical.He referred to progressives and traditionalists.In this case Bishop Frederick Henry and the SSPX are interpreting the  Council II as a break with the past.They both assume that the dead saved are visible to us and so are an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades

BISHOP FREDRICK HENRY OF CALGARY,CANADA RESPONDS: SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/01/bishop-fredrick-henry-of-calgarycanada.html#links
  Archbishop Gerhard Muller,Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican has got it right!
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/12/archbishop-gerhard-mullerprefect-of.html#links


ARCHBISHOP,CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND LAY APOLOGIST SAY VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS : "We don't know any case of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance.Only Jesus can judge"

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishopcatholic-priests-and-lay.html#links

No comments: