Monday, October 22, 2012

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not know the reason why Vatican Council II was modernist. It was there before him but he could not see it.


Since he did not know about the false premise he could not see an alternate interpretation to the Council.

Since then the Society of St.pius X (SSPX) bishops condemn the Council and do not see Vatican Council II with the correct premise.

The SSPX uses the interpretation of the left, the present day modernists.

If Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the founder of the SSPX, was aware of the Richard Cushing Heresy he could have presented the Council as traditional and not modernist.

The Council without the Richard Cushing Error of being able to see the dead saved is in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus , the Syllabus of Errors and the SSPX position on other religions.

Since he did not seem aware of this error, just like the SSPX bishops, they assumed that the Nicene Creed means there is not one (known) baptism for the forgiveness of sins but that there are three known, visible baptisms for the forgivness of sin.Cases of the  baptism of desire  are visible to them. So there are two baptisms. They can also judge who is a martyr saved in 2012. So cases of the baptism of blood are also visible to them. There are now three baptisms for the forgiveness of sin according to an SSPX website report.

There could also be the Vatican Council II 'baptisms' of the 'seeds of the Word' (Ad Gentes), 'impefect communion with the church' (Unitatis Redintigratio) and 'a good conscience' (Lumen Gentium 16).

In all these 'baptisms' the SSPX can see the dead saved on earth and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not point out this error to them. It seemed accepted by the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith too.-Lionel Andrades

BOTH ARCHBISHOP MULLER AND DI NOIA MADE A FACTUAL ERROR IN THEIR SEPARATE INTERVIEWS WITH THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER


It seems as if the Vatican Curia is in schism.

Archbishops of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican assumed that we can see people dead and saved who are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus , which says all need to convert into the Church.

Archbishop Gerhard Müller in the National Catholic Register  interview : 'The Church Is Not a Fortress' cites Lumen Gentium 14, as an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.


Archbishop Muller , the Prefect of the CDF when asked about extra ecclesiam nulla salus (which Pope Pius XII called' the dogma' , the 'infallible statement' in the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston), said:

The Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.” He who is aware of the presence of Revelation is obliged by his conscience to belong publicly

But we cannot say that those who are inculpably ignorant of this truth are necessarily condemned for that reason. We must hope that those who do not belong to the Church through no fault of their own, but who follow the dictates of their God-given conscience, will be saved by Jesus Christ whom they do not yet know. Every person has the right to act according to his or her own conscience.

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is implying that those who are inculpably ignorant are an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This is not true since  cannot see the dead who are saved in inculpable ignorance. We cannot judge who they are. We cannot meet them on earth. So how can they be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?. It is a fact that the dead saved are not visible to us.He suggests they are.

ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA


Archbishop Di Noia said that ' Council did say that there were elements of grace in other religions'. He is implying that these cases are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
How much is a perceived weakening of the dogma extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church) a major part of the problem, as some traditionalists assert? Has today’s understanding of the dogma contradicted its earlier teaching?
I don’t know if you can blame this on the Council so much as the emergence of a theological trend that emphasized the possibility of salvation of non-Christians. But the Church has always affirmed this, and it has never denied it. … 
The Council did say there are elements of grace in other religions, and I don’t think that should be retracted. I’ve seen them, I know them — I’ve met Lutherans and Anglicans who are saints.'


There are those who are saved with 'elements of grace in other religions' and he knows who they are personally ?.

Only if he knows who they are can they be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So his statement is false since only God can judge who in 2012 has 'elements of grace' and is saved.We cannot say that a particular person is going to be saved. We cannot know that a particular Protestant is going to Heaven. It is a fact that we do not know any any such person saved in the present times.Neither do we know who  is going to be saved and is an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.

Archbishop Augustine  Di Noia is saying that we know people who are saved with 'elements of grace in other religions' for them to be explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It's only if these cases are known that they can be exceptions to the tradiitonal teaching.

Two Archbishops are in public denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also the Syllabus of Errors with an irrationality - that of being able to see the dead saved on earth.They are not excommunicated or declared to be in schism.
-Lionel Andrades

ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER CHOOSES A HERETICAL INTERPRETATION OF LUMEN GENTIUM 14 WHICH IS A BREAK FROM TRADITION


ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER ASSUMES THAT THE DEAD WHO ARE SAVED ARE VISIBLE ON EARTH AND SO EVERY ONE DOES NOT NEED TO ENTER THE CHURCH:NCR interview


Archbishop Gerhard Muller indicates all Protestants at the Synod are on the way to Hell: Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II


Archbishop Augustine Di Noia says the Holy Spirit preserves the Church from error including the interpretation of Vatican Council II- we now know there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, which one is guided by the Holy Spirit ?


ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA MADE A FACTUAL ERROR IN THE ITC PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS 1997


IS THE HOLY SPIRIT SAYING LIKE ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA THAT LG 8, LG 16 ARE EXPLICITLY KNOWN AND ARE EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA?

NO SSPX RESPONSE TO TWO QUESTIONS ON RORATE CAELI

The website Rorate Caeli is viewed by the Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX) leaders and supporters. Rorate Caeli posted two questions. No one wants to answer them

Here are the two questions unanswered:

Questions for the SSPX speakers:
1. Do we know in the year 2012 any one saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, a good conscience, seeds of the word (AG 7), imperfect communion with the Church ?
2. If we do not know any of these cases in 2012 can they be considered exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors?

If they answer 'No we do not know anyone' to Question 1 and 'No they are not exceptions' to Question 2 then would it mean that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake about Vatican Council II ? Is this the reason why there is no answer ?

Would it mean that Vatican Council II is saying outside the church there is no salvation? So all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell?

Does it mean Bishop Bernard Fellay and the SSPX bishops were wrong about Vatican Council II? The Council is traditionalist and not modernist with respect to other religions? The Council is saying that non Catholics need to convert for salvation (AG 7) and invincible ignorance etc (LG 16) are not exceptions to AG 7 ?

Recently a Redemptorist priest in Rome who offers the Novus Ordo Mass said Vatican Council II does not contradict itself (AG 7 does not contradict LG 16 etc) and Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades


RORATE CAELI BLOCKS THE REPORT ‘RAMPANT HERESY IN THE SSPX’
 
SSPX DISTRICT ITALY CONFERENCE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspc-district-italy-conference-on.html#links

CLARIFICATION FROM THE SSPX NEEDED
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/clarification-from-sspx-needed.html#links

SSPX IS CONTRADICTING THE NICENE CREED : THEY BELIEVE IN TWO OR MORE 'KNOWN' BAPTISMS FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SIN

FATHER NIKLAUS PFLUGER IN FIRST CLASS HERESY ?

Liberals because of the use of the false premise want the Council to be accepted in its present form


REDEMPTORIST PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF NOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS


CARDINAL JOSEPH RATZINGER AND ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE COULD HAVE PREVENTED THE SSPX PROBLEM BY IDENTIFYING THE WRONG PREMISE