Saturday, September 15, 2012

Jeff Mirus has become a traditionalist.

In silence he concedes that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma and that it is always just a possibility, known to God and unknown to us.It does not contradict the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney so Fr.William Most was wrong.

Now Jeff Mirus knows that the baptism of desire is irrelevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma. So the report  Tragic Errors of Fr.Leonard Feeney is obsolete.

Jeff Mirus now holds the same position on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as the SSPX Chapter statement (July 19,2012). He is saying that there is no salvation outside the church like the SSPX. Since there are no known exceptions, as he previously thought there were.

He will also have to review the position of Catholic Culture on Vatican Council II itself.

Lumen Gentium 16 is no more for him an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma. Since there are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it means the Council supports the Syllabus of Errors for him.

Vatican Council II is a traditional Council with Ad Gentes 7 saying non Catholics, Protestants included, need Catholic Faith for salvation ( to avoid Hell).-Lionel Andrades

JEFF MIRUS AND PHIL LAWLER DON’T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/jeff-mirus-and-phil-lawler-dont-have.html#links

It' time for the SSPX to diversify the ownership of its property and limit its liability.

If the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) places the ownership of its property in the name of different people associated with the SSPX, then the threat of losing all their property ends.Today under the anti- Semitism laws they could be asked to expel Bishop Richard Williamson.Tomorrow they could be asked not to proclaim Jesus and accept the Jewish Left understanding of history-without the Messiah.If not they could be sued for compensation.


Politically there is no demand that Catholics give up their faith in Jesus, who is anti-Semitic for many, but it could change tomorrow. New laws could be created.


They could close down Catholic and Christians websites and blogs but if they come for your property don't let then take it all at once.


The persecution of the SSPX is underway. Is the SSPX going to protect its interests by denying core Catholic teachings, as is being done by the Vatican?

Today they are applying thought control laws on one bishop. Tomorrow they could apply it to another.


The enemies of the Church want the SSPX to come 'in line' as the Opus Dei priests and the Opus Dei's Holy Cross University, Rome.Security in exchange for the faith as in Muslim ruled countries.-Lionel Andrades
_________________________________________________