ROME HAS TO CONVERT WHEN THE SSPX ANNOUNCES RICHARD CUSHING WAS IN HERESY

Often I hear the SSPX religious say Rome must convert and then we will join them. Rome will convert but the key lies with the SSPX. Rome is modernist because unknowingly it assumes that Fr. Leonard Feeney was in heresy and not the Archbishop of Boston.

If Richard Cushing was in heresy then it means Vatican Council II affirms the literal traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Then obviously the Council would be rejecting the ‘theology of religions’, ‘ecclesiology of communion’ salvation outside the church, ecumenism of non return etc.

Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston  indicated that there are visible cases saved with the baptism of desire. This is in heresy.If Cushing is rejected then  the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is exclusive ecclesiocentrism. Religious liberty is traditional.

Rome has to convert since how can they keep repeating the irrationality of the visible dead (with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance) once the SSPX is aware of this error and goes public.

 How can they keep saying that we know non Catholics saved ‘who are ‘good and holy’, 'in imperfect communion with the Church' or saved with 'the seeds of the Word' when we do not know any of these cases in 2012 who can be an exception to the dogma or the Syllabus of Errors?

So the responsibility for Rome’s conversion lies with the SSPX. The SSPX priests must understand that Fr. Leonard Feeney could not be in heresy for affirming a defined dogma which does not mention 'exceptions'.

When it is implied that Vatican Council II mentions ‘exceptions’ we must observe  that none of the ‘exceptions’ are known to us in the present time. So they do not contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney. Vatican Council II is a traditionalist Council. This has not been the formation of seminarians at Econe.

So the SSPX priests should not walk away from the main body until they understand this and can present a rational response for or against what is being said here.Over time Rome and the SSPX will understand. So just wait. Stay where you are.

The SSPX priest Fr. Fox from Australia speaks about knowing the will of God.

God of course will not want any priest to accept irrationality like visible dead exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Also the SSPX communiqué has not directly recognized  Vatican Council II with the Richard Cushing error. It  instead affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and rejects the possibility of knowing any exceptions.

This is indirectly affirming a traditional Vatican Council II with traditional values on other religions, ecumenism and religious liberty.So whether one is in or out of the SSPX Vatican Council II is traditional.-Lionel Andrades