Saturday, August 11, 2012

FR.NICHOLAS PFLUGER PLEASE ANNOUNCE THAT THE RICHARD CUSHING HERESY IS UNACCEPTABLE.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) needs to correct the confusion in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.


We cannot phone, fax or meet anyone saved with the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire is not an exception to anything .The CDF must acknowledge that it was the Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuits there who were in heresy.


Fr.Nicholas Pfluger the second in charge of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) says that the moto proprio regarding the Traditional Latin Mass was being opposed by many bishops since it was feared that it “would create doctrinal problems.It endangers the achievements of Vatican Council II” (31:40)


Fr. Pfluger like the bishops who oppose the Traditional Latin Mass  could know that the Latin Mass sidesteps the controversy in the 1940’s when the cardinal archbishop said that there were known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma.


So the issue is extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Traditional Latin Mass still has the ecclesiology of the literal interpretation of the dogma on salvation. Those who offer the Mass in the vernacular assume that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma.


So it is the dogma which has been changed for them in Vatican Council II since there are alleged exceptions (LG 16 etc).


So it is because of the Richard Cushing heresy they interpret Vatican Council II as liberal and a rejection of Fr.Leonard Feeney.


If Fr.Nicholas Pfluger would see that the problem originates in the error of Archbishop Richard Cushing then Vatican Council II becomes a traditional Council. There are no exceptions to the dogma. Since there are no exceptions to the dogma, we have the literal interpretation still valid.


When there is the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus there cannot be a ‘theology of religions’ , ‘ecclesiology of communion’ vagueness on ‘collegiality’...


The present Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Sean O Malley will not answer two questions(1). He probably knows unlike Fr.Nicholas Pfluger that Cardinal Richard Cushing held a heretical position.


If Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy and not Archbishop Cushing then Vatican Council II is a modernist Council. So bishops are opposing the Traditional Latin Mass since they assume that Fr.Leonard Feeney is in heresy.How can he be in heresy when the dogma does not mention exceptions. It was Cardinal Richard Cushing who claimed there were exceptions.- Lionel Andrades





1.
NUMBER OF PRIESTS NOT ANSWERING THE TWO QUESTIONS INCREASES
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/number-of-priests-not-answering-two.html#links

FR.JOE JENKINS WANTS THE SSPX TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE VISIBLE DEAD THEORY: EVEN BISHOPS MULLER AND DI NOIA WANT THE SAME
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/frjoe-jenkins-wants-sspx-to-accept.html#links

No comments: