Rorate Caeli is not reporting that Vatican Council II upholds the rigorist interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church, even though this issue is crucial for the SSPX’s entry into the Church with canonical status.
Leftists demand that any such report (comment) on Rorate Caeli be pulled down immediately.
The Jewish Left considers it anti-Semitic.
Catholic liberals assume LG 16 is an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma so such a statement is flawed.
The (Society of St.Pius X) SSPX uses the liberal’s interpretation of Vatican Council II and also assumes LG 16 is an explicit exception. So they reject Vatican Council II.
Traditionalists supporting Fr. Leonard Feeney criticize the liberals and the SSPX for denying the ancient interpretation of the dogma. They do not say that LG 16 is implicit and so cannot be an explicit exception to the traditional interpretation.
Meanwhile there seems another breakdown in the SSPX –Vatican talks as Cardinal Ladaria and Cardinal Koch assume that LG 16 is explicit and so contradicts the literal interpretation of the centuries old dogma. Ladaria, Secretary of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith and Koch, President of the Council for Christian Unity and relations with the Jews, believe Vatican Council rejects the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney. So they expect the SSPX to accept their version of the Council before receiving canonical status.
Cardinals, bishops and priests do not want to comment on this issue out of concern for the Jewish Left and their anti-Semitism laws.
Bishop Bernard Fellay has been removing reports on SSPX websites which are alleged, by the Jewish Left, to be anti Semitic. Rorate Caeli is also monitored by the Left.
Now Vatican Council II is being considered anti Semitic. However this is not being reported in the main stream media. It cannot be reported.
If the SSPX admits that Vatican Council II meets the Jewish Left criteria of being anti Semitic they would be saying Vatican Council (AG 7, LG 14) agrees with the SSPX position on other religions (including Judaism) ecumenism and religious liberty, the latter being a natural consequence of the dogma on exclusive salvation.
If Vatican Council II is anti Semitic, when it supports the literal interpretation of the dogma then it means all Dominicans, Franciscans and Jesuits can hold the literal interpretation of the dogma along with being saved with implicit and invincible ignorance.
It also means Vatican Council II supports Fr. Leonard Feeney.
It is important to remember that LG 16 states that ‘those who do not know the Gospel through no fault of their own and who follow the dictates of their conscience’ can be saved. LG 16 does not say that these cases are known to us, or are the ordinary means of salvation or that they contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma or that they contradict AG 7 which says all need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation.-Lionel Andrades
_____________________________________
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.- Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II
Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.- Lumen Gentium 16
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment