Nothing in Vatican Council II contradicts the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not say non Catholics who are saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) were a known example to the dogma.
The Holy Spirit’s teaching exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church is the same before and after Vatican Council II.
If the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that the baptism of desire was an exception to the dogma, it made a mistake.There is no known case of the baptism of water to contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Neither do we know anyone saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (LG 16) which could contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney
If the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) realize this at their present Chapter Meeting they will know that their traditional position is that of Vatican Council II and that Cardinals Ladaria, Koch and Schonborn cannot support their liberal theories from Vatican Council II with any citation from the Council. - Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment