The SSPX must respond to the Ecclesia Dei's interpretation of Vatican Council II indicated in the NCR interview.
The Vice President of Ecclesia Dei believes LG 8 and LG 16 are not implicitly known but explicit for us. So LG 8 and LG 16 refer to exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma.
The SSPX could just announce that they reject the leftist version of Vatican Council II and are considering an interpretation of the Council in which LG 8 and LG 16 are implicit to us and known only to God.
The leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II is flawed since it assumes LG 8 and LG 16 are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Integrity demands that the Vatican cardinals and the Ecclesia Dei themself make the announcement on LG 8 and LG 16 not being defacto known to us. So Lumen Gentium,Vatican Council II cannot be explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma defined three times as the Archbishop implies.
Neither is LG 8,LG 16 an exception to Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II which says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment