Archbishop Augustine di Noia from 1997 to 2002 was a member of the International Theological Commission(ITC). In 1997 they issued the theological paper Christianity and the World Religions (1) in which they made a glaring objective error. Along with Frs.Luiz Ladaria S.J, Charles Morerod O.P, Augustine Di Noia O.P assumed that those saved in invincible ignorance and implicit desire are known to us and so they are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Then they went a step further and postulated that since we know of these exceptions to the dogma there can also be exceptions for infants who die without the baptism of water. Instead of Limbo they go straight to Heaven (2). They were supported in these error by Pope Benedict XVI.
Since they assumed that there were known exceptions to the dogma in the ITC papers they approved a 'theology of religions'. Yet in the interview with the National Catholic Register Archbishop Di Noia is critical of the theology of religions.
Since they assumed that there were known exceptions to the dogma in the ITC papers they approved a 'theology of religions'. Yet in the interview with the National Catholic Register Archbishop Di Noia is critical of the theology of religions.
The ITC paper also approved of an ecclesiology of communion based on the error of known exceptions to the dogma.
It is based on this very error that Bishop Bernard Fellay has probably received a list of theological conditions for the SSPX entry into the Church with canonical status. The SSPX bishops cannot refute those theological errors, since they also believe that there are known exceptions to the dogma, even though Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not make this claim. The founder of the SSPX only acknowledged that a non Catholic can be saved in invincible ignorance etc. He did not say that these cases were known to us or were explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In his recent interview with La Stampa the American Vice President of Ecclesia Dei now holds the heretical position that Jews do not have to convert in the present times which is contradictory to the Bible, the Nicene Creed , the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II (AG 7). This is also contradicting Dominus Iesus, which he once defended. Dominus Iesus 20 says God's salvation is available for all, it is universal however to receive it the church is necessary. This is also the message of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined three times.
The Archbishop vaguely says the Church is necessary but also suggests that there are known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Chruch.
The Archbishop vaguely says the Church is necessary but also suggests that there are known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Chruch.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
Christianity and the World Religions(1997)
2.
THE HOPE OF SALVATION FOR INFANTS WHO DIE WITHOUT BEING BAPTISED
___________________________________________________
ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through
CARDINAL LEVADA WRITES PREFACE FOR ITC BOOK : IT SAYS THE HOLY OFFICE CORRECTED FR.LEONARD FEENEY FOR DENYING THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, WHICH IT IS ASSUMED (WRONGLY) CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA
If the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 said that the baptism of desire was an exception to the dogma they made a mistake: So why cannot the Leadership Conference of Women Religious hold the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus along with implicit baptism of desire ?
Jesuit priest says change in Church’s teaching on Limbo due to change in Church’s teaching on baptism and salvation
JOHN VENNARI DIDN'T NOTICE IT!
There is no reference text in Vatican Council II contrary to the SSPX position on other religions, ecumenism
CONDITIONS FOR THE SSPX TO 'ENTER THE CHURCH'
There could soon be an 'ecclesial rupture' because the Vatican does not want to say that there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II.
VATICAN-SSPX NEED TO CALL TIME OUT: ERROR IN LIGHT OF THE WORLD DIRECTLY LINKED TO DIFFERENCES IN ECUMENISM, INTER-RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE, RELIGIOUS LIBERTY WHICH MSGR.NICOLA BUX MENTIONED
HOLY FATHER ASSUMES THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE KNOWN TO US: CONTRADICTS VATICAN COUNCIL I AND II
HOLY FATHER MAKES AN OBJECTIVE ERROR IN WRITING
The Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ says Nostra Aetate 4,Vatican Council II
DID THE POPE REALLY DENY THE FAITH ON THE NEED FOR JEWS TO CONVERT ?
ANIVERSARY OF THE DENIAL OF THE FAITH BY THE MAGISTERIUM ?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment