JUST ONE SSPX PRIEST

Just one SSPX (Society of St.Pius X) priest is needed who understands - and will speak out the truth in public.

This good priest just has to announce :-

1. Common sense tells us that we cannot see or know any person on earth, who is already in Heaven and saved. In faith we know it is possible to be saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire but we cannot see these cases in heaven.If they are in heaven they are not on earth.

For instance we know Mother Teresa is in Heaven because the Church has declared her a saint but none of us can say that we see her in Heaven. In general we cannot see her or anybody in Heaven. Some people may have the charism to see people in heaven but in general we cannot. So in principle, in faith we can say that she is in Heaven.Similarly in principle, in faith we can accept that there could be people saved in invincible ignorance etc but in fact, personally ,we cannot see these people in heaven.

So we do not know anyone in heaven saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16), the seeds of the Word (Vatican Council II) etc.We cannot also see them on earth.Personally we do not know who is in Heaven through personal knowledge. In faith we accept that the saints are in heaven.

2.Since the Letter of the Holy Office indicates that the baptism of desire is an explicit exception to the dogma (as the SSPX priests and leaders affirm) then it must be that these cases are known to the leaders of the SSPX. They can see them on earth. Since they can see them on earth or in heaven they are obvious exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma..

3.So if the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 suggests that the baptism of desire etc are exceptions to the dogma then it is irrational. We do not know any exceptions on earth. We cannot know.The Letter of the Holy Office would be wrong. Factually incorrect.

4. Since we do not know any exceptions it would be wrong for the SSPX to assume that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

5.Since we do not know any exception it would be wrong for the SSPX to assume that Vatican Council II contradicts itself i.e LG 16 contradicts AG 7.

6.So if we come back to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and AG 7 and there are no known exceptions on earth, then there are no contradictions to the SSPX position on other religions and ecumenism.All non Catholics need to convert to avoid Hell (for salvation).

7.So Vatican Council II really supports the SSPX position on other religions.

8.It means Cardinal Kurt Koch and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria cannot cite any reference from Vatican Council II (e.g LG 16) to contradict the SSPX traditional position.

So then there can be only one interpretation with references, from the Council.

It’s important that Msgr.Nicola Bux and the Ecclesia Dei clarify in public these eight points.

Signed: .....

(Name of SSPX priest)

Just one priest is needed to ask these questions!