The Dimond Brothers at the Most Holy Family Monastery assume that the baptism of desire cases are known to us so they contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and other magisterial teachings.So they reject the baptism of desire.Bishop Robert McKenna also believes that these cases are known to us and so they are exceptions to the dogmatic teaching that every one needs to convert into the Church for salvation.
Pope Benedict XVI in Light of the World p.107 also assumes that these cases are explicit exceptions to the dogma and AG 7,Vatican Council II.Cardinal Luiz Ladara Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in two papers of the International Theological Commission makes this same error and so concludes that there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) priests Fr.Peter Scott and Fr.Francois Laisney also make this same error. Fr.Laisney has published a book with this error and it is being sold by the SSPX.
Why cannot all Cardinals, bishops, priests, nuns and other Catholic religious accept the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also implicit baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance?
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 does not say that Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for heresy. It mentions disobedience. If they assumed that he was in heresy for saying that there was no baptism of desire ,just like the Dimond Brothers, then those who wrote the Letter of the Holy Office made an objective, factual error. The baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma.We don’t know anyone on earth saved with the baptism of desire.
These cases are accepted as possibilities which are known only to God. We can never ever know any case saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance.
Hence there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Instead Vatican Council II is in agreement with the traditional understanding of ecumenism, other religions and religious liberty.
The Dimond Brothers nor the SSPX priests will admit they are wrong and neither will they respond to these reports. –Lionel Andrades
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/debate_with_mckenna.php
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
POPE CONTRADICTS BIBLE, CARDINAL LEVADA ISSUES NO CLARIFICATION. EXPECTS OFFICAL CLARIFICATION FROM BISHOP FELLAY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/pope-contradicts-bible-cardinal-levada.html
ST.THOMAS DID NOT REJECT “INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE”: HE KNEW IT DID NOT CONTRADICT THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION, WHICH HE HELD
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/stthomas-did-not-reject-invincible.html#links
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment