CARDINAL RATZINGER REMAINED SILENT IN THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE?! WAS HIS ARM BEING TWISTED AS NOW?

Dictatorship of relativism within the Catholic Church

Was Cardinal Ratzinger himself confused on the issue or was he afraid to offend the Zionists with the truth?

For the Jewish Left it is their political position that Fr. Feeney was anti Semitic and that he was excommunicated for holding to the literal interpretation of the dogma.

Yes he held the interpretation of the dogma so how could he be excommunicated for it. Here is the dogma he affirmed.

1. “There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215). Ex cathedra.

2.“We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.).Ex cathedra.

3.“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.) Ex cathedra – from the website Catholicism.org

The actual dogma (above) says everyone with no exception needs to be a formal member of the Catholic Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

Cardinal Ratzinger in a an interview with the Jewish Left magazine Times did not say the dogma was ex cathedra.Neither did he say that it was  the same teaching held by Fr. Leonard Feeney.Neither did he say that this was the official teaching of the church in the past and the present. Instead he said that the teaching on extra ecclesiam nulla salus was relevant only for that time. ( The Trinity was given to us by a Council in the fourth century.So?) This was not the teaching of the Magisterium.

He placed no contradiction in the Catechism of the Catholic Church regarding  the secular media reports which said that Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for heresy.

Was the cardinal confused and later convinced by Fr. Hans Kung‘s book which said that Lumen Gentium 16 contradicted the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus i.e. there can be people saved in other religions who are in invincible ignorance etc. (How can it contradict the dogma when we do not know a single case of a person being saved in invincible ignorance or  the baptism of desire? LG 16 refers to  those saved and explicitly known only to God. It is always implicit for us.Common sense not theology!)

Perhaps he was not confused. Since the way the Catechism is written especially CCC 1257 indicates Cardinal Ratzinger was indirectly promoting the rigorist interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus i.e. there are those saved de facto with the baptism of water and Catholic Faith and this is the ordinary way of salvation while there can be those saved with the Sacraments (without us seeing them visibly receive the Sacraments), but known only to God. They could have received the Sacraments and the necessary help and this would be known only to God. This was the traditional position of St. Thomas Aquinas. Conceptually ( in principle) he accepted the existence of the man in the forest in invincible ignorance while he taught that de facto ( in reality) everyone with no exception needs to be a formal member of the church for salvation.

So was it because of  the fear of being accused of anti Semitism and offending the influential Zionists that he allowed the confusion on this issue to continue ?

The bottom line is that he allowed people to believe what is not the teaching of the Catholic Church and what really was the political position of The Tablet, U.K, National Catholic Reporter and Jewish Left publications and media. These publications would not issue a clarification or contradiction when informed about the true position of the Fr. Feeney case. Since they wanted people to believe in what is not the teaching of the Catholic Church. Then they would claim that ‘everybody believes this’ and ‘how can you change the belief of everybody’.

 Fr. Feeney was not defended because the Vatican was protecting itself.

Fr. Feeney was excommunicated for disobedience and not doctrine. The first half of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 deals with doctrine and the second half with discipline. The secular media mixes this up.

1). If he was excommunicated for heresy then the Holy Office 1949 was wrong and made a mistake.

2) Assuming he was excommunicated for  heresy then the Letter of the Holy Office contradicts the thrice defined dogma (above). The  Letter issued by Cardinal Ottaviani (1949) was in error?

An infallible teaching supersedes a Letter of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the (Holy Office).

There is no Church document which says that Fr.Leonard  Feeney was excommunicated for heresy.

So for Cardinal Ratzinger to deny an ex cathedra dogma in public (Times interview etc) means he is in :

1. First Class heresy. It is the denial of the Creed. The necessity of the baptism of water and Catholic Faith for all for salvation.

2. It was a lie to appease the Zionists.

3. It was an injustice done to a Catholic priest.

Read the dogma Cantate Domino above. Was the cardinal, now pope, so afraid of the Jewish Left and their Catholic supporters that he did not use the actual text in the Catechism of the Catholic Church?

He let the confusion continue among Catholics’

Pope Benedict XVI is my pope and I pray for him. However he is in public mortal sin for denying an ex cathedra dogma in public.

 Pope Benedict has recently confirmed that present day Jews do not have to convert into the Catholic Church to go to Heaven. This new teaching of the Catholic Church is not based on any new Christian Revelation but to avoid the threats of the Jewish Left against the Vatican.( “Light of the World: The Pope, the Church, and the Signs of the Times”, Peter Seewald, Ignatius Press, 2010).

Now it has all become public and is no more a secret.

RABBI SAYS NOW NO CHURCH MONIES ALLOTTED AS BEFORE FOR MISSION TO JEWS: POPE AGREES THERE IS TO BE NO PROCLAMTION OF THE GOSPEL TO THE JEWS

The Jewish Left have stated that the Catholic Church no more spends funds on mission targeting the Jews.

This was stated by a Rabbi on the website of the Archdiocese of Boston, whose Ecumenical and Inter Religious Dialogue has become highly political.The Archdiocese which continues dialogue with only the Jewish Left has still not affirmed Vatican Council II on its website.

The Rabbi had made his statement when the Ecumenical and Inter Religious Affairs of the Archdiocese of Boston made the following material available on its website.

ADL online guide: Nostra Aetate: Transforming the Catholic-Jewish Relationship.

(http://www.adl.org/main_Interfaith/nostra_aetate.htm) includes essays by some of the world's leading Jewish-Catholic interfaith experts who analyze the history and significance of Nostra Aetate, (http://www.adl.org/main_Interfaith/nost ... atisit.htm) as well as a practical "how-to" guide on teaching the lessons of Nostra Aetate to new generations of Catholics and Jews.

It may be mentioned that Rabbi Segni Pacifici , the Jewish Left Rabbi in Rome in an interview with the magazine 30 GIORNI also said that the Catholic Church now has no mission office to the Jews.

Now Pope Benedict has confirmed that present day Jews do not have to convert into the Catholic Church to go to Heaven. This new teaching of the Catholic Church is not based on any new Christian Revelation but to avoid the threats of the Jewish Left against the Vatican.( “Light of the World: The Pope, the Church, and the Signs of the Times”, Ignatius Press, 2010).

This is the first time in writing that the pope has stated in public that there is no mission to the Jews and that Jews do not have to convert. In the past as Cardinal Ratzinger he was also appeasing the Zionist leadership through confidential messages and telephone calls. There was No Mission in the Church based on Catholic doctrine. There  was no ex cathedra dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 

Now it has all become public and not more a secret.

So it was understandable that all these years the Boston archdiocese website mentioned that the Jewish Anti-Defamation League(ADL) has announced the creation of a new online guide which explains the historic changes in Church theology and provides educational resources in order to teach them. The Archdiocese encouraged it. The educational resources never mentioned that Nostra Aetate does not say that Judaism is a path of salvation. Neither does Nostra Aetate say that Jews in general are saved in Judaism or that Jews do not have to convert. So the educational resources were in error. Among the documents provided there is no trace of Ad Gentes 7 which indicates all Jews need Catholic Faith and the Baptism of water in the present times, to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.

The Catholic Church sees salvation among the Jews and Muslims as the extraordinary, exceptional way. This is how Lumen Gentium 16 and Vatican Council II are officially interpreted by the Catholic Church. In ‘certain circumstances’ (Letter of the Holy Office 1949) a person can be saved in invincible ignorance. However even if this did happen in the present times we would not know of a single case. Only God can judge such cases. So this is no contradiction to the ex cathedra dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which says every Jew with no exception needs to enter the Church, to avoid Hell. This is the teaching of the Promised Jewish Messiah rejected by present day Judaism which has no Temple, no sacrifice in the Temple, no Jewish Messiah and are no more the chosen people of God. It is the followers of the Promised Messiah within the Catholic Church who are the continuation of the Jewish religion and who are the Chosen People of God.They are the people of the New Covenant.

Also the leadership of present day Jews is dominated by Zionists, who are political Jews, of the Left. They promote abortion and sodomy which is a sin for Jews. The pope considers them as representing all Jews, because of their political, economic and military power.

They are also recognized by the Archdiocese of Boston Ecumenical and Inter Religious Affairs department which puts aside Vatican Council II as interpreted by the Council’s text and only what is liked and comfortable is chosen. Nostra Aetate is served without Vatican Council II’s Ad Gentes, the Church’s teaching on Missionary Activity.

Ad Gentes 7 says all people need to enter the Catholic Church.

Lumen Gentium 14 says Catholic Faith and Baptism are needed for all. The website holds that non Catholic religions are the ordinary way of salvation.

The Decree on Ecumenism ( UR ) 3, Vatican Council II: Catholic Church is the true faith.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church 845: God the Father wants all people to worship Him and to enter the Catholic Church. God the Father wants all people to be united into the Catholic Church.

Notification, N.7, Fr. Jacques Dupuis S.J, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican Prefect: Cardinal Ratzinger: All people need to be oriented into the Catholic Church and to be a part of her.

Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston who gives the Eucharist to pro abortion politicans, rejecting Catholic moral teaching ,has never affirmed Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 of Vatican Council II with reference to the Jews, thus rejecting also a faith-teaching of the Catholic Church. He is now also supported by the pope openly.

Neither have they clarified the old Boston Case in which Fr.Leonard Feeney was not excommunicated for heresy.The Letter of the Holy Office(Vatican) 1949 upheld the 'dogma' and the 'infallibile' teaching as did Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center (SBC). The SBC was placed under interdiction by the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing which was an injustice to them. An apology was due from the Archdiocese of Boston and the Jesuits at Boston College. There was no clarification from the Vatican and probably to avoid  tension with the Jewish Left.

The Society of St.Pius X bishops were excommunicted for rejecting Vatican Council II. However the clergy in the Archdiocese of Boston are spared.

JEWISH LEFT OPPOSES CATHOLIC CHURCH AND JUDAISM

The Jewish Left are people who claim they are Jews and have a political ideology of the Left. They approve abortion, homosexuality etc even though this is contrary to the Law of Moses and the account of Sodom and Gomorrah which is part of the first five books of the New Testament that we have in common with the Jews.

The Jewish Left include influential organisations including major newspapers.

They support values associated with Zionism, Communism and Masonry.

They include the Jewish Anti-Defamation League(ADL). The media is made up of the New York Times, Newsweek,Times etc.

They are opposed to the teachings of the Catholic Church and Judaism.

They approve the freedom of expression regarding evils ( pornography,immodesty,concubinage..) and oppose the freedom of expression on the number of people killed in the Holocaust and the manner in which they were killed( gas chambers or malnutrition).

They have placed laws in many countries which can result in many years of imprisonment for denying the Holocaust. Presently an educated person is serving a six year term in England under the Jewish Left Anti-Semitism laws.

According to the ADL law even if you associate with a person condemned as anti Semitic you are liable for criminal charges of anti-Semitism(hate).

The secular newspapers continue a hate campaign against the Catholic Church with false details on the Galileo Case and the Inquisition but are silent over millions of deaths through abortion and- the imprisonment of persons for alleged hate speech or thoughts(Anti-Semitism).

The Jewish Left do not represent all Jews and they are opposed in public by an organisation representing over a thousand Rabbis.Rabbis also claim that the ADL is a source of anti-Semitism directed against innocent rank and file Jews. http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/

The Holy Father says six million Jews were killed in gas chambers.Fine. I will agree with him. However there are revisionists who provide alternate data regarding the number of Jews killed and the manner in which they were killed. These revisionists are being put in prison and a hate campaign is conducted against them by the Jewish Left media.

Take the case of Bishop Williamson. He has said that he loves the Jews. He is not against all Jews. He once invited a Rabbi to speak at his seminary.Yet the media and Jewish organisations condemn him.

He stood trial for anti Semitism but not the the Swedish TV channel that reported his message.There is no hate charge against the media or the journalists.

Since the anti Semitism laws only target non-Jews.Rabbi Shifren has said that the ADL is a cause of anti-Semitism.But the ADL is free and untouchable according to the Anti Semitism laws.So is Rabbi Shifren.

It’s under these conditions that the Catholic Church has made a historic and unbiblical change in its teachings with reference to the Jews.