Monday, March 18, 2024

Today I spoke to a student of the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome studying Missiology : There was a discovery for him. He learnt that LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc always refer to hypothetical cases only in 2024. This was a new version of Vatican Council II

 

MARCH 18, 2024



Today I spoke to a student of the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome studying Missiology : There was a discovery for him. He learnt that LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc always refer to hypothetical cases only in 2024. This was a new version of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/03/today-morning-i-was-talking-to-student.html

Repost : 'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

 

AUGUST 11, 2017

Repost : 'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

MAY 13, 2017

'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

'The dogma of the faith' has not been lost and the Society of St. Pius X  are at the point where they can trigger a schism among the liberal bishops conferences and religious communities but also bring Rome, the Vatican, back to the Catholic Faith with one stroke, one simple action, one small theological and philosophical correction.
(AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino). Pope Francis walks past a statue of the Virgin Mary prior to the start of a mass at the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Fatima Saturday, May 13, 2017, in Fatima, Portugal. The pontiff will canonize on Saturday two poor, illite...
Our Lady at Fatima said that the dogma of the faith will be lost except in Portugal, if she was referring to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, then it is presently lost among all sections of Catholics.
We have discovered however,thanks to her and Jesus, the specific cause of the loss of this dogma of the faith.We have found the missing link and we can correct the mistake.Whether the present liberal magisterium accepts the error and makes the change, is not known.However Catholics in general can come back to the Faith as it was known over the centuries.Whether they will be persecuted and isolated for this is another issue.However for the average Catholic, theologically and doctrinally we are once again in harmony.
The SSPX could restore 'the dogma of the faith' since they have a personal interest in doing so - their canonical recognition.They simply have to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with 'the dogma of the faith'.This will cause a rebellion.The world will be furious. May be there will even be a schism before unity is restored.
However as Archbishop Lefebvre wanted, 'Rome will come back to the faith'. 
Image result for Photos Leonard FeeneyImage result for Photos Leonard FeeneyImage result for Photos Leonard Feeney
We must remember Leonard Feeney of Boston. He took on the entire Boston Establishment.They threw everything at him and he did not recant.

This is the big moment for the SSPX and the sedevacantists. They can affirm all magisterial documents with the theology of Feeneyism and bring Rome and the whole Church back to the Catholic Faith.-Lionel Andrades

 AUGUST 11, 2017



Magisterium made a mistake in excommunicating Fr. Leonard Feeney since BOD,BOB and I.I refer to invisible people : Vatican Council II interpretation changes

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/magisterium-made-mistake-in.html




Video Ave Verum - Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 



 Perpetual Vows of Brother Joseph Mary, MICM 




Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 



Vocation Video



Sister's Profession of Vows 2014 

Repost : Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

 

AUGUST 12, 2017

Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness

REV. MSGR. TODD J. LAJINESS, RECTOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY, DETROIT AGREES WITH PROFESSORS RALPH MARTIN, ROBERT FASTIGGI AND PHILLIP BLOSSER - THERE ARE NO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE(BOD), BAPTISM OF BLOOD (BOB) AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (I.I) IN 2017.

He is confirming what is common knowledge for us human beings.Invisible people cannot be visible at the same time.People in Heaven are generally not visible on earth to the mass of people in 2017.They would be known only to God.
I have been sending Msgr. Lajiness and the faculty members these blog posts and no one has disagreed with me or correct an error in anything I have written.
No one, as expected, has said that people in Heaven are visible on earth or that we can see the dead, who are now in Heaven, saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.It is obvious that we humans cannot meet on earth someone who is in Heaven allegedly saved with the BOD, BOB and I.I.
Neither can we say that any particular person in 2017 will be going to Heaven without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and instead will be saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.
So there is no denial, correction or clarification from Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness  who has completed a Licentiate in Philosophy at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum), Rome in 2000.He also earned a Doctorate in Philosophy from the Angelicum in 2002.
According to his bio data on the seminary website the young Rector's professional activities include being a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools and also working in close collaboration with ATS on accreditation visits to seminaries throughout the USA.Additionally, he serves as the President of the National Association of Catholic Schools.
I don't expect him to say anything extraordinary like - there is a dead man seen walking on the streets of Detroit saved without the baptism of water.
It may be mentioned that the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome, Fr.Stefano Visintini osb, has said that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not objective exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS. They do not contradict EENS as it was known to St. Benedict.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson has the same message and a few years back he called upon the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II. He would be referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the interpretation which does not mix up hypothetical cases as being objectively seen in the present times.So LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc being theoretical and hypothetical would not contradict the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Church.There would be no break with the Syllabus of Errors.

THE PROBLEM
But even though all of us agree that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS and that  BOD, BOB and I.I are not objective to be exceptions, while Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ingnorance) would also not be a rupture with the dogma EENS, since it refers to a hypothetical case, there still is a problem.It's a big problem.

THEY HAVE TO TEACH IRRATIONAL REASONING
The problem is that professors Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi would agree with us here too, invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to EENS, however when they  teach theology they affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.It is a rupture with Feeneyite  EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 
Since they infer that Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to non- hypothetical cases, which are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

THEOLOGY- DEGREES  GIVEN TO THOSE WHO ACCEPT IRRATIONALITY
So they approve of academic degrees in theology being given to those who interpret Vatican Council II  with the irrationality( invisible cases are  visible exceptions to traditional EENS).This is irrational and non traditional and is also approved by Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness

EXAMPLES OF SACRED HEART SEMINARY HERESY
1. The faculty have changed the interpretation of the dogma EENS or rejected it. This is heresy.
2. They are not interpreting and affirming Vatican Council II without the irrationality. Then the Council would be in harmony with traditional EENS. This is again heresy.
3. They interpret the Nicene Creed with the same irrationality and so the understanding of the Nicene Creed changes. This is first class heresy. For me it is 'I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water'. For the seminary faculty it is 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, desire, blood,invincible ignorance, seeds of the word etc, and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.'

RUPTURE WITH THE PAST MAGISTERIUM
So with the confusion created by their philosophical reasoning, they profess and teach a new irrational and non traditional theology which results in new doctrines which are accepted by the magisterium but are heretical. They are a rupture with the past magisterium of the Catholic Church.

THEY COULD AFFIRM THE FAITH WITHOUT THE IRRATIONALITY
They could simply state that as Catholics, they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion.
1.They could state instead, that they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.
2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.
3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'
4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.
5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/rev-msgr-todd-j-lajiness-rector-and.html

Repost : Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

 

 AUGUST 12, 2017

Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
Dr.Eduardo J.Echeverria is a professor of Philosophy and Theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary and his publications include 'Pope Francis and the Legacy of Vatican Council II'. He means Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise.This is the only Vatican Council II he knows. 
Victor and Elizabeth Sales, Associate Professors of Philosophy at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit, are in a philosophical soup too, ends don't tie up and they have to project confusion and irrationality as being Catholic philosophy.
Their reasoning is wrong and their philosophy is bad when they teach students that Vatican Council II is a rupture with  Tradition. They infer like the traditionalists that LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, AG 7, UR 3, GS 22, etc refer to concrete, known cases saved outside the Church.This is how the Archdiocese interprets the Council.
The motto of the Detroit seminary is 'forming Hearts and Minds. Proclaiming Jesus Christ'.They mean, with bad philosophy and theology they form hearts and minds and they proclaim Jesus Christ, without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
So there is known salvation outside the Church for  Eduardo J.Echeverria and  Victor and Elizabeth Sales as a result of their  bad reasoning.This is bad philosophy and it is not Catholic. It is objectively wrong and so cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.



Forming Hearts and Minds. 

Proclaiming Jesus Christ.
With a foundation in bad philosophy they prepare Catholic students at the seminary to receive the bad theology they have personally received.
They have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial.
So when I send them these blog posts they do not comment  since even though their  philosophy and theology is deceptive and the teaching dishonest they have to go through with it.
They give students a foundation in irrational reasoning, with the help of a false premise, which 'forms hearts and minds', to accept an innovative and new theology, which makes Vatican Council II a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in PhilosophyImage result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
The two Associate Professors have to violate Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.
How can people in Heaven, allegedly saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) be objective exceptions on earth to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation?
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
Would these professors of Philosophy be able to state as simple Catholics that they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology at Sacred Heart Seminary  is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they personally affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion?

1.They could state instead, that they as professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.
2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.
3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'
4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.
5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by making a philosophical error ;  by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
These five points would help them not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in their teaching and personal beliefs as Catholics.
I have also asked Dr.Phillip Blosser, a professor of Philosophy at this seminary to affirm these five points as a Catholic, as I do, and I am waiting for his reply.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/professors-of-philosophy-at-sacred.html

Repost : Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness grants accreditation to only those Catholic instituitions which do not admit that the Church made a mistake

 

 AUGUST 13, 2017

Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness grants accreditation to only those Catholic instituitions which do not admit that the Church made a mistake


Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness

The Catholic Church made a mistake more people are realizing it. They made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.Since  the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) refer to invisible people.They could not be objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the past or present.
So when it is often said that Pope Pius XII excommunicated Fr.Leonard Feeney with the support of Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston, it only means that the pope and the cardinal made an objective mistake. They assumed BOD, BOB and I.I referred to physically visibile people, known cases saved outside the Church.
If the pope violates the Principle of Non Contradiction it does not make the pope correct. We cannot see people on earth saved with BOD, BOB and I.I even if the pope suggests otherwise.
If the Magisterium violates the Principle of Non Contradiction the magisterium is still wrong.
The Catholic Church made an objective mistake through its popes, cardinals and bishops. Pius XII confused  what is invisible as being visible, what is unknown as being known.
Then upon this philosophical error a new theology was created and supported by Rahner, Ratzinger, Cushing, the Jesuits and others which indicated that there is salvation outside the Church.
This new reasoning was applied at Vatican Council II.Lumen Gentium 16 was interpreted as being visible and non hypothetical..So with this false premise there was a non traditional conclusion. The Council had to emerge as a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.This was only due to the interpretation.There was another choice.
However interpreting Vatican Council II with LG visible is obligatory at Catholic seminaries and univesities and it is the only one the present magisterium seems to know or want to know.
If LG 16 is considered invisible and unknown in particular cases Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, AG11, GS 22 would all be irrelevant to the the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
But this is not being taught at the Catholic universities and seminaries.This is an alternative interpretation which is rational and traditional  and has a continuity with the past.Pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiolgoy would be the same.
Even those who know, who discern the magisterial error,  do not want to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, the Feeneyite traditional version.
So Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness, the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit,  who is  a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools(ATS),USA  and also works with ATS on accreditation, visits seminaries throughout the USA.He ensures that this irrationality is taught in salvation theology. The traditional ecclesiology is rejected. It is not said that 'the Church made a mistake'.
The accreditation is only given to those instituitions which do not admit that 'the Church made a mistake' in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
Accreditation is only given to those institutions which intepret Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 as referring to visible and known people saved outside the Church.
This is deception and dishonesty.
-Lionel Andrades


AUGUST 12, 2017


Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/rev-msgr-todd-j-lajiness-rector-and.html




AUGUST 12, 2017


Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/professors-of-philosophy-at-sacred.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/msgrtodd-j-lajiness-grants.html

Repost : Vatican hides the Leonard Feeney secret from secular newspapers : CDF made an objective error

 

AUGUST 14, 2017

Vatican hides the Leonard Feeney secret from secular newspapers : CDF made an objective error

The Vatican is hiding the Leonard Feeney issue from the secular newspapers.The Church made a mistake an objective error.The Boston Heresy refers to the magisterium of that time.There never were exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Since the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to invisible people.
Image result for Photos John Martignoni EWTNImage result for Photos John Martignoni EWTN
Zero cases of something cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS says the apologist John Martignoni.
Popes, cardinals and bishops since Pius XII have assumed invisible for us baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma EENS as it was known to St. Maximillian Kolbe, whose feast we celebrate today.
The secular newspapers are not aware of this.They do not know that the Church made a mistake in the Boston Heresy case and without this error, the interpretation of Vatican Council II completely changes.
Image result for Fr.Stefano Visintini osb photos St.Anselm Rome
The Vatican is not telling the media that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 wrongly suggests that there are known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I which contradict EENS as it was propagated by Fr.Leonard Feeney.

If they did know about this the media could accuse the Vatican of deception and dishonesty.Even after being informed, the CDF/Ecclesia Dei, is hiding this  error and a possible new interpretation of the Council.It would be in harmony with the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, for example, as  in pre Kolbe times.

ALL THE BISHOPS' CONFERENCES HAVE MADE AN ERROR 
All the bishops' conferences  have made an error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the media are not into it.I have been writing on this issue for many years and popes and CDF prefects have come and gone but none of them wanted to talk about this 'dark secret'.Some religious in Rome who know about it say it's  a sensitive issue and they do not want to be quoted.

EXCOMMUNICATION OF FR.LEONARD FEENEY WAS AN INJUSTICE.
The magisterium wrongly excommunicated the priest from Boston.It was an injustice. He was not teaching any thing new.He refused to claim like the Archbishop, the Jesuits in Boston and the cardinals in Rome - that he could see and know physically visible cases of people saved outside the Church.The Jesuits expelled him and the Archbishop ostracized him and the St.Benedict Center, for not saying there was salvation outside the Church.

In a prepared statement for the press the former Jesuit(Fr.Leonard Feeney) added: "The conscience difficulty is that the diocese of Boston, under the auspices of Archbishop Cushing, and Boston College, under the auspices of Father John J. McEloney, S.J., both notably ignorant in the field of Catholic theology ... are teaching that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church." - Father Feeney Is Dismissed From Jesuit Order by Rome
 http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1949/10/29/father-feeney-is-dismissed-from-jesuit/


 LEFEBVRE WAS CORRECT ABOUT THE COUNCIL : EXCOMMUNICATION WRONG
Similarly the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was wrong since without this mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case Vatican Council II is not rupture with Tradition.No one informed the Archbishop.Even Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger were interpreted  Vatican Council II with the irrationality.Archbishop Lefebvre was correct about the Council.

LUIZ LADARIA AND WALTER KASPER MADE A MISTAKE ON LG 16
Lumen Gentium 16 never was an exception to EENS.Wikipedia and so many others on the Internet have got it wrong.The Church also made a mistake on LG 16.Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J in the International Theological Commission, Vatican papers and Cardinal Walter Kasper in an online article for the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity have repeated this error. I have written about it on my blog. Similarly all the ecclesiology professors at pontifical universities in Rome repeat the magisterial mistake. Even the SSPX seminaries unknowingly use the new theology based on invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I being visible exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.The media meanwhile is clueless. 

ROME WAS IN HERESY
The Church made a mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case and it was Rome and the Archbishop in Boston who were really in heresy.They were rejecting Kolbe's exclusive salvation in the Church, by inferring that invisible people were visible exceptions.
Image result for Photo ECCLESIA DEI VATICANImage result for Photo ECCLESIA DEI VATICANImage result for Photo ECCLESIA DEI VATICANImage result for Photo CARDINAL LADARIA
The CDF/Ecclesia Dei are today forcing the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II with this invisible- cases- are- visible reasoning which came into the Church at Boston.
Image result for Photo vATICAN pRESS OFFICE
The secular media does not know that the New Theology, which incorporates this error, can be avoided in the interpretation of the Council.Vatican Council II would then be rejected by the liberal bishops' conferences.The Left would call it 'fundamentalism' and 'political hate'.
However if the pope violates the Principle of Non Contradiction it still does not make the pope correct. We cannot see people on earth saved with BOD, BOB and I.I even if the pope suggests otherwise.This is a fact of life.
If the Magisterium violates the Principle of Non Contradiction the magisterium is still wrong.
The magisterium does not release the secret.If Lumen Gentium 16 is considered invisible and unknown in particular cases Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.This is something obvious.Since LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, AG11, GS 22 would all be irrelevant to EENS.
BOD, BOB and I.I were irrelevant to EENS.This was known to St.Maximillian Kolbe in his radio programs and newspaper editions from the Cities of Mary, Cities of the Immaculate(Niepokalanòw).

 SECRET AT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES AND SEMINARIES
This is kept a secret at Catholic universities and seminaries.There is an alternative interpretation which is rational and traditional  and has a continuity with the past but it is hushed up.Pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology would be the same but this is information kept hidden.
Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. LajinessImage result for Photo Sacred Heart Major seminary logo
Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness, the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit,  who is  a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools(ATS),USA  and also works with ATS on accreditation, visits seminaries throughout the USA.He ensures that this irrationality is taught in salvation theology. The traditional ecclesiology is rejected. It is not said by him that 'the Church made a mistake'.
The accreditation is only given to those instituitions which will not say that 'the Church made a mistake' in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
Accreditation is only given to those educational institutions which interpret Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 with the irrationality i.e it refers to visible and known people saved outside the Church.They have to choose Cushingism and reject Feeneyism to be recognised by the Catholic Church.
This is deception and dishonesty.

IRRATIONAL 
How can people in Heaven, allegedly saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) be objective exceptions on earth to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation?
Image result for Fr.Stefano Visintini osb photos St.Anselm Rome
It may be mentioned that the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome,Fr.Stefano Visintini osb, has said that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not objective exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS. They do not contradict EENS as it was known to St. Benedict.
Image result for Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson photos
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson has the same message and a few years back he called upon the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II. He would be referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the interpretation which does not mix up hypothetical cases as being objectively seen in the present times.So LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc being theoretical and hypothetical would not contradict the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Church.There would be no break with the Syllabus of Errors.

SSPX CAN CAUSE A SCHISM BUT BRING ROME BACK TO THE FAITH AS LEFEBVRE WANTED
The Society of St. Pius X  are at the point where they can trigger a schism among the liberal bishops conferences and religious communities but also bring Rome, the Vatican, back to the Catholic Faith with one stroke, one simple action, one small theological and philosophical correction.They can affirm all magisterial documents with the theology of Feeneyism and bring Rome and the whole Church back to the Catholic Faith.This would be sensational for the media.
Image result for Photo vATICAN pRESS OFFICE
MYSTICI CORPORIS AND THE CATECHISM OF TRENT ARE FEENEYITE
Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura, Catechism of Trent and Pius X do not state that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible, instead of invisible cases.Yet the SSPX seminarians assume they refer to visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. So they say that the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS cannot be accepted by them since (visible for them) BOD, BOB and I.I mentioned in Mystici Corporis, Catechism of the Council of Trent etc contradict Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.This is also the understanding in the media.
Image result for Photo vATICAN pRESS OFFICE
If the SSPX bishops and the seminary faculty did not interpret BOD,BOB and I.I and other hypothetical cases(LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc) as referring to known people saved without the baptism of water; saved outside the Church, then Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with Tradition for the media.
Image result for Photos  leaks to the mediaImage result for Photos  leaks to the media
Like the seminarians at Detroit, it is obligatory for the SSPX seminararians too, to state in public that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS and that the Holy Office 1949 did not make an objective mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.So there will not be any leaks to media from them.
When the mistake made by the Church is avoided it completely changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II and this is not taught at the SSPX or Detroit  seminary.The Vatican keeps quiet.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/vatican-is-hiding-leonard-feeney-issue.html